FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   >>  
ess of discipline. General Scammon was at the time still colonel of the Twenty-third. The regiment on that march repeatedly reported, as I was glad to do, not a single absentee on the first roll-call immediately after the halt. The altercation, in its general facts, was as you recall it. But the occasion of it was this. The regiment halted to bivouac in a stubble-field. The men got bundles of straw, or possibly of wheat unthreshed, from a stack in the field to lie upon. General Reno saw it. I was temporarily absent. The general, as you say, "in a rough way" accosted the men, and as I returned, I heard his language and retorted in behalf of my men, not in my own case at all, for he had said nothing to me. Hence the row between us. I was told, while I was lying wounded, [Footnote: During the battle of South Mountain.--J. D. C.] that General Reno was greatly pleased by our vigorous attack, and that he paid us a high compliment, expressing gratification that our difficulty had gone no further than it did. Now excuse my suggestion. Let officers tell the story whose names are not called in question in the note referred to--say General Scammon, General Crook, and yourself. I am grateful for your attention to this misrepresentation, and hope you will not differ widely from me as to the correctness of the course I take. Sincerely, (Signed) R. B. HAYES. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF ARIZONA, WHIPPLE BARRACKS, PRESCOTT, A. T., November 27, 1882. MY DEAR GENERAL,--Referring to your letter of the 3d instant asking replies to certain queries with reference to the conduct of the Kanawha Division during the Antietam campaign, I can only reply generally. The twenty years which have elapsed make my memory indistinct, and I can now recall only prominent features or particular incidents in which I was especially interested. I remember distinctly, however, that the Kanawha Division compared favorably in discipline and general good conduct with the best troops of the army. In my own brigade there was no straggling, or, if any, so little that it did not come to my notice. I am quite sure there was no pillaging in my brigade. My men probably took fence rails for their bivouac fires, and straw and hay for their beds, but to the best of my belief there was nothing done that could be called pillaging. I heard, at the time, something with reference to a controversy between Generals Reno and Hayes, but if ever I knew what it was abou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   >>  



Top keywords:

General

 

general

 
called
 

brigade

 

reference

 

Division

 

conduct

 

Kanawha

 

pillaging

 

regiment


recall

 
Scammon
 
discipline
 

bivouac

 
replies
 
instant
 

Generals

 

campaign

 

controversy

 

Antietam


letter

 

queries

 

DEPARTMENT

 

ARIZONA

 

HEADQUARTERS

 

Sincerely

 

Signed

 

WHIPPLE

 

BARRACKS

 
GENERAL

November

 

PRESCOTT

 
Referring
 

troops

 

favorably

 
distinctly
 

compared

 
notice
 

straggling

 
remember

memory

 

indistinct

 

prominent

 
elapsed
 

twenty

 

interested

 
incidents
 

features

 

belief

 
generally