FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247  
248   249   >>  
adjustment without the possibility of establishing exact reasons for any distinctions made. Finally, since such distinctions are liable to be varied from time to time, an income tax requires some nice adjustment as to the nature of the income. An income from the sale of property is entirely different in character from the income made by interest on the same property. One is a part of permanent investment, the other is the result of productive investment. One destroys the principal if consumed, the other adds to the principal. Yet no one could arrive at the actual, natural income, without a most intricate system of book-keeping open to public inspection. For without public inspection the temptation to fraudulent returns, under the feeling that the tax is unjust, is so strong as to be demoralizing. _Inheritance taxes._--A device much employed for making large accumulations of wealth bear a larger portion of the community's burdens is a heavy tax upon inheritance. Since such inheritance requires the guardianship of law for security of transfer, government is suffered to take a liberal fee for such transfer. Moreover, the inheritor is assumed to have no such property interest in what has been accumulated by another as to claim that he can be wronged if government takes a portion. It is defended also by socialists on the ground that large estates are dangerous to the general welfare. Some facts bear upon the opposite side, and are worthy of consideration. A large estate is the accumulation of enterprise and industry on the part of a man of more than ordinary abilities. The presumption is in favor of following his judgment in making that useful after his death. Most frequently it is employed in some huge industrial machine, which the public cannot manage, but can destroy by even taking a portion from it. One of the main stimulants to all accumulation is the provision for the future wants of a family. If the state takes the accumulation, it also takes the responsibility for the successors in the family line. Wherever it is applied, it is felt to be a heavy burden upon the community at large. If the state interferes with the freedom of a testator, the chances are that few estates will be accumulated, and wasteful methods of expenditure, diminishing the power of the entire community, will surely follow. Moreover, evasions of the inheritance tax are comparatively easy, and are likely to be adopted extensively by the holders of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247  
248   249   >>  



Top keywords:

income

 
public
 

property

 
community
 
portion
 

inheritance

 

accumulation

 

inspection

 
estates
 
making

accumulated
 

Moreover

 

transfer

 

principal

 

employed

 

government

 

family

 

investment

 
distinctions
 
interest

requires

 

adjustment

 

comparatively

 

abilities

 

ordinary

 

evasions

 
follow
 
judgment
 

surely

 
entire

presumption

 
industry
 

opposite

 
extensively
 
holders
 

welfare

 
adopted
 

enterprise

 

estate

 
worthy

consideration

 

general

 

testator

 

future

 

provision

 

stimulants

 
chances
 

responsibility

 

successors

 

burden