FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  
e" should be applied only to darkened values, and not to hues or chromas. Yet one writer says, "This yellow shades into green," which is certainly a change of hue, and then speaks of "a brighter shade" in spite of his evident intention to suggest a stronger chroma, which is neither a shade nor brighter luminosity. Children gain wrong notions of "tint and shade" from the so-called standard colors shown to them, which present "tints" of red and blue much darker than the "shades" of yellow. This is bewildering, and, like their elders, they soon drop into the loose habit of calling any degree of color-strength or color-light a "shade." _Value_ is a better term to describe the light which color reflects to the eye, and all color values, light or dark, are measured by the _value-scale_. "Tone" is used in a confusing way to mean different things. Thus in the same sentence we see it refers to a single touch of the brush,--which is not a tone, but a paint spot,--and then we read that the "tone of the canvas is golden." This cannot mean that each paint spot is the color of gold, but is intended to suggest that the various objects depicted seem enveloped in a yellow atmosphere. Tone is, in fact, a musical term appropriate to sound, but out of place in color. It seems better to call the brush touch a _color-spot_: then the result of an harmonious relation between all the spots is _color-envelope_, or, as in Rood, "the chromatic composition." "Intensity" is a misleading term, if chroma be intended, for it depends on the relative light of spectral hues. It is a degree rather than a quality, as appears in the expressions, intense heat, light, sound,--intensity of stimulus and reaction. Being a degree of many qualities, it should not be used to describe the quality itself. The word becomes especially unfit when used to describe two very different phases of a color,--as its intense illumination, where the chroma is greatly weakened, and the strongest chroma which is found in a much lower value. "Purity" is also to be avoided in speaking of pigments, for not one of our pigments represents a single pure ray of the spectrum. Examples are constantly found of the mental blur caused by such unfortunate terms, and, since misunderstanding becomes impossible with measured degrees of hue, value, and chroma, it seems only a question of time when they will take the place of tint, tone, shade, purity and intensity. CHAPTER II. CO
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

chroma

 

degree

 

describe

 

yellow

 

measured

 

intense

 

quality

 

intensity

 

pigments

 
intended

single
 

brighter

 

values

 
shades
 

suggest

 

applied

 
reaction
 

darkened

 
stimulus
 

qualities


expressions
 

composition

 

Intensity

 

misleading

 

chromatic

 

envelope

 

chromas

 

appears

 

spectral

 

relative


depends

 

misunderstanding

 

impossible

 
unfortunate
 

caused

 

degrees

 

CHAPTER

 
purity
 

question

 
mental

constantly
 
strongest
 

Purity

 

weakened

 

greatly

 

illumination

 

avoided

 

spectrum

 
Examples
 

represents