FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
I have taken a great deal of pains about your _salicaria_ and mine, with a white stroke over its eye and a tawny rump. I have surveyed it alive and dead, and have procured several specimens, and am perfectly persuaded myself (and trust you will soon become convinced of the same) that it is no more nor less than the _passer arundinaceus minor_ of Ray. This bird, by some means or other, seems to be entirely omitted in the British Zoology; and one reason probably was because it is so strangely classed in Ray, who ranges it among his _picis affines_. It ought, no doubt, to have gone among his _aviculae cauda unicolore_, and among your slender-billed small birds of the same division. Linnaeus might with great propriety have put it into his genus of _motacilla_; and _motacilla salicaria_ of his _fauna suecica_ seems to come the nearest to it. It is no uncommon bird, haunting the sides of ponds and rivers where there is covert, and the reeds and sedges of moors. The country people in some places call it the sedge-bird. It sings incessantly night and day during the breeding-time, imitating the note of a sparrow, a swallow, a skylark, and has a strange hurrying manner in its song. My specimens correspond most minutely to the description of your _fen salicaria_ shot near Revesby. Mr. Ray has given an excellent characteristic of it when he says, "_Rostrum et pedes in hac avicula multo majores sunt quam pro corporis ratione_." See letter, May 29th, 1769. (Preceding letter xxiv.) I have got you the egg of an _oedicnemus_, or stone-curlew, which was picked up in a fallow on the naked ground. There were two, but the finder inadvertently crushed one with his foot before he saw them. When I wrote to you last year on reptiles, I wish I had not forgot to mention the faculty that snakes have of stinking _se defendendo_. I knew a gentleman who kept a tame snake, which was in its person as sweet as any animal while in good humour and unalarmed, but as soon as a stranger, or a dog or cat, came in, it fell to hissing, and filled the room with such nauseous effluvia as rendered it hardly supportable. Thus the squnck, or stonck, of Ray's "Synop. Quadr." is an innocuous and sweet animal; but, when pressed hard by dogs and men, it can eject such a most pestilent and fetid smell and excrement, that nothing can be more horrible. A gentleman sent me lately a fine specimen of the _lanius minor cinerascens cum macula in scapulis alba
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

salicaria

 

gentleman

 

motacilla

 

animal

 

specimens

 

letter

 

crushed

 

finder

 

inadvertently

 
faculty

forgot
 

avicula

 

reptiles

 
mention
 

ground

 

ratione

 
corporis
 

oedicnemus

 
Preceding
 

curlew


majores
 

fallow

 

snakes

 

picked

 

scapulis

 

stonck

 

innocuous

 

squnck

 

supportable

 

cinerascens


lanius

 

specimen

 

pestilent

 
excrement
 

pressed

 

rendered

 

horrible

 
humour
 

person

 
defendendo

unalarmed
 
macula
 

filled

 

hissing

 

nauseous

 

effluvia

 

stranger

 

stinking

 
strange
 

reason