the said
Michiev had long since departed this world; but Sobakevitch's eloquence
had got too thoroughly into its stride to admit of any interruption.
"And look, too, at Probka Stepan, the carpenter," his host went on. "I
will wager my head that nowhere else would you find such a workman. What
a strong fellow he was! He had served in the Guards, and the Lord only
knows what they had given for him, seeing that he was over three arshins
in height."
Again Chichikov tried to remark that Probka was dead, but Sobakevitch's
tongue was borne on the torrent of its own verbiage, and the only thing
to be done was to listen.
"And Milushkin, the bricklayer! He could build a stove in any house you
liked! And Maksim Teliatnikov, the bootmaker! Anything that he drove
his awl into became a pair of boots--and boots for which you would
be thankful, although he WAS a bit foul of the mouth. And Eremi
Sorokoplechin, too! He was the best of the lot, and used to work at
his trade in Moscow, where he paid a tax of five hundred roubles. Well,
THERE'S an assortment of serfs for you!--a very different assortment
from what Plushkin would sell you!"
"But permit me," at length put in Chichikov, astounded at this flood of
eloquence to which there appeared to be no end. "Permit me, I say, to
inquire why you enumerate the talents of the deceased, seeing that they
are all of them dead, and that therefore there can be no sense in doing
so. 'A dead body is only good to prop a fence with,' says the proverb."
"Of course they are dead," replied Sobakevitch, but rather as though the
idea had only just occurred to him, and was giving him food for thought.
"But tell me, now: what is the use of listing them as still alive? And
what is the use of them themselves? They are flies, not human beings."
"Well," said Chichikov, "they exist, though only in idea."
"But no--NOT only in idea. I tell you that nowhere else would you
find such a fellow for working heavy tools as was Michiev. He had the
strength of a horse in his shoulders." And, with the words, Sobakevitch
turned, as though for corroboration, to the portrait of Bagration, as is
frequently done by one of the parties in a dispute when he purports to
appeal to an extraneous individual who is not only unknown to him, but
wholly unconnected with the subject in hand; with the result that the
individual is left in doubt whether to make a reply, or whether to
betake himself elsewhere.
"Nevertheless, I
|