| 
en Carrier |  2.80 | 0.17  | German Pouter     |  2.36 | 0.54 |
  | Dragon             |  2.45 | 0.41  | Jacobin           |  2.33 | 0.22 |
  | Carrier            |  2.75 | 0.35  | English Frill-back|  2.40 | 0.43 |
  | Short-faced Tumbler|  2.05 | 0.28  | Swallow           |  2.45 | 0.17 |
  +--------------------+-------+-------+-------------------+-------+------+
{175}
    This table shows that in these twelve breeds the sternum is on an
    average one-third of an inch (exactly .332) shorter than in the
    rock-pigeon, proportionally with the size of their bodies; so that the
    sternum has been reduced by between one-seventh and one-eighth of its
    entire length; and this is a considerable reduction.
    I have also measured in twenty-one birds, including the above dozen,
    the prominence of the crest of the sternum relatively to its length,
    independently of the size of the body. In two of the twenty-one birds
    the crest was prominent in the same relative degree as in the
    rock-pigeon; in seven it was more prominent; but in five out of these
    seven, namely, in a fantail, two scanderoons, and two English carriers,
    this greater prominence may to a certain extent be explained, as a
    prominent breast is admired and selected by fanciers; in the remaining
    twelve birds the prominence was less. Hence it follows that the crest
    exhibits a slight, though uncertain, tendency to become reduced in
    prominence in a greater degree than does the length of the sternum
    relatively to the size of body, in comparison with the rock-pigeon.
    I have measured the length of the scapula in nine different large and
    small-sized breeds, and in all the scapula is proportionally shorter
    (taking the same standard as before) than in the wild rock-pigeon. The
    reduction in length on an average is very nearly one-fifth of an inch,
    or about one-ninth of the length of the scapula in the rock-pigeon.
    The arms of the furcula in all the specimens which I compared, diverged
    less, proportionally with the size of body, than in the rock-pigeon;
    and the whole furcula was proportionally shorter. Thus in a runt, which
    measured from tip to tip of wings 381/2 inches, the furcula was only a
    very little longer (with the arms hardly more divergent) than in a
    rock-pigeon which measured from tip to tip 261/2 inches. In a barb, which
    in all its measurements was a little larger th
     |