FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3668   3669   3670   3671   3672   3673   3674   3675   3676   3677   3678   3679   3680   3681   3682   3683   3684   3685   3686   3687   3688   3689   3690   3691   3692  
3693   3694   3695   3696   3697   3698   3699   3700   3701   3702   3703   3704   3705   3706   3707   3708   3709   3710   3711   3712   3713   3714   3715   3716   3717   >>   >|  
down to that moment. Through the whole period of independence in the time of Anjou, Matthias, Leicester, as well as under the actual government, it had been the invariable custom thus to provide both by land and sea and on the rivers against robbers, rebels, pirates, mischief-makers, assailing thieves, domestic or foreign. It had been done by the immortal William the Silent on many memorable occasions, and in fact the custom was so notorious that soldiers so enlisted were known by different and peculiar nicknames in the different provinces and towns. That the central government had no right to meddle with religious matters was almost too self-evident an axiom to prove. Indeed the chief difficulty under which the Advocate laboured throughout this whole process was the monstrous assumption by his judges of a political and judicial system which never had any existence even in imagination. The profound secrecy which enwrapped the proceedings from that day almost to our own and an ignorant acquiescence of a considerable portion of the public in accomplished facts offer the only explanation of a mystery which must ever excite our wonder. If there were any impeachment at all, it was an impeachment of the form of government itself. If language could mean anything whatever, a mere perusal of the Articles of Union proved that the prisoner had never violated that fundamental pact. How could the general government prescribe an especial formulary for the Reformed Church, and declare opposition to its decrees treasonable, when it did not prohibit, but absolutely admitted and invited, provinces and cities exclusively Catholic to enter the Union, guaranteeing to them entire liberty of religion? Barneveld recalled the fact that when the stadholdership of Utrecht thirty years before had been conferred on Prince Maurice the States of that province had solemnly reserved for themselves the disposition over religious matters in conformity with the Union, and that Maurice had sworn to support that resolution. Five years later the Prince had himself assured a deputation from Brabant that the States of each province were supreme in religious matters, no interference the one with the other being justifiable or possible. In 1602 the States General in letters addressed to the States of the obedient provinces under dominion of the Archdukes had invited them to take up arms to help drive the Spaniards from the Provinces and to join the Confede
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3668   3669   3670   3671   3672   3673   3674   3675   3676   3677   3678   3679   3680   3681   3682   3683   3684   3685   3686   3687   3688   3689   3690   3691   3692  
3693   3694   3695   3696   3697   3698   3699   3700   3701   3702   3703   3704   3705   3706   3707   3708   3709   3710   3711   3712   3713   3714   3715   3716   3717   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

government

 

States

 

provinces

 

religious

 

matters

 
Prince
 

province

 
impeachment
 

invited

 

Maurice


custom
 

decrees

 
treasonable
 

opposition

 

declare

 
Reformed
 

Church

 

cities

 

Archdukes

 

absolutely


prohibit

 
admitted
 

Spaniards

 

Provinces

 

perusal

 

language

 

Confede

 
Articles
 

proved

 

general


prescribe

 

especial

 

formulary

 

prisoner

 

violated

 
fundamental
 

exclusively

 
Catholic
 
supreme
 
reserved

disposition

 

solemnly

 

interference

 

Brabant

 
resolution
 

support

 
deputation
 

conformity

 
justifiable
 

liberty