FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235  
1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   >>   >|  
. A state, single towards the rest of the world, a unit in its external relations, while permitting internally a variety of sovereignties and institutions--in many respects the prototype of our own much more extensive and powerful union--was destined to spring from the act thus signed by the envoys of five provinces. Those envoys were acting, however, under the pressure of extreme necessity, and for what was believed an evanescent purpose. The future confederacy was not to resemble the system of the German empire, for it was to acknowledge no single head. It was to differ from the Achaian league, in the far inferior amount of power which it permitted to its general assembly, and in the consequently greater proportion of sovereign attributes which were retained by the individual states. It was, on the other hand, to furnish a closer and more intimate bond than that of the Swiss confederacy, which was only a union for defence and external purposes, of cantons otherwise independent. It was, finally, to differ from the American federal commonwealth in the great feature that it was to be merely a confederacy of sovereignties, not a representative Republic. Its foundation was a compact, not a constitution. The contracting parties were states and corporations, who considered themselves as representing small nationalities 'dejure et de facto', and as succeeding to the supreme power at the very instant in which allegiance to the Spanish monarch was renounced. The general assembly was a collection of diplomatic envoys, bound by instructions from independent states. The voting was not by heads, but by states. The deputies were not representatives of the people, but of the states; for the people of the United States of the Netherlands never assembled--as did the people of the United States of America two centuries later--to lay down a constitution, by which they granted a generous amount of power to the union, while they reserved enough of sovereign attributes to secure that local self-government which is the life-blood of liberty. The Union of Utrecht; narrowed as it was to the nether portion of that country which, as a whole, might have formed a commonwealth so much more powerful, was in origin a proof of this lamentable want of patriotism. Could the jealousy of great nobles, the rancour of religious differences, the Catholic bigotry of the Walloon population, on the one side, contending with the democratic insanity of the Ghent
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235  
1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
states
 

envoys

 

people

 
confederacy
 
sovereign
 

constitution

 
United
 

States

 
commonwealth
 

general


amount

 

assembly

 

attributes

 

differ

 

independent

 

sovereignties

 
single
 

powerful

 

external

 

assembled


Netherlands

 
granted
 

generous

 

reserved

 

representatives

 
centuries
 

America

 

supreme

 

instant

 

succeeding


dejure

 

allegiance

 

Spanish

 

instructions

 

voting

 
diplomatic
 
monarch
 

renounced

 

collection

 

deputies


nobles

 

rancour

 

religious

 
differences
 

jealousy

 
lamentable
 

patriotism

 

Catholic

 

bigotry

 

democratic