for a city
that arose from an amalgamation of four originally distinct quarters.
("Sirpurla" in _Revue Archeologique_, 1888.) The suggestion has been
generally, though not universally accepted.
[30] That Ninib is only an ideographic form is sufficiently clear from
the element NIN-, lord. The proof, however, that Ninib is Adar, is still
wanting. See Jensen, _Kosmologie der Babylonier_, pp. 457, 458.
[31] From the context (De Sarzec, _Decouvertes_, pl. 6, no. 4, ll.
13-21, and pl. 31, no. 3, col iii. ll. 2-6), there can be no doubt that
Shul-gur (or Shul-gur-ana) is an epithet of Nin-girsu. The ideographs
descriptive of the edifice suggest a corn magazine of some kind. One is
reminded of the storehouses for grain in Egypt. See Jensen's Notes,
_Keils Bibl._ 3, 1, pp. 15, 18, 73. A comparison of the two texts in
question makes it probable that Ab-gi and E-bi-gar are synonymous.
[32] Rawlinson, iv. 27, no. 6; 11, 45-46.
[33] It is noticeable that there is no mention made of a special god of
Lagash, which points to the later origin of the name.
[34] Inscr. D, col. li. 13; G, col. ii. ll. 1-8; iii. 4 _seq._
[35] See Gen. xxiv. 53. Burkhardt, _Notes on the Bedouins_, i. 109,
gives an example of the custom.
[36] The two names are used by Gudea (Inscr. G, col. iii. 12) in a way
to indicate that they embrace the whole district of Lagash.
[37] _Semit. Voelker_, p. 382.
[38] See Jensen, _Keils Bibl._ 3, 1, 28, note 2.
[39] The first signifies 'to make,' the third means "good, favorable,"
but the second, upon which so much depends, is not clear. Amiaud reads
_tum_ instead of _sig_.
[40] _E.g._, Nina (see below).
[41] De Sarzec, pl. 7, col. i. 12.
[42] _Hibbert Lectures_, p. 104.
[43] Inscr. D, col. iv. ll. 7, 8.
[44] In Rawlinson, ii. 58, no. 6, there is a list of some seventy names.
[45] Rawlinson, ii. 58, no. 6, 58.
[46] De Sarzec, pl. 8, col v. ll. 4-6.
[47] _Keils Bibl._ 3, 1, 80, note 3.
[48] Rawlinson, iv. 35, no. 2, 1.
[49] See a syllabary giving lists of gods, Rawlinson, ii. 60, 12. Dungi,
indeed, calls Nergal once the king of lawful control over Lagash
(Rawlinson, iv. 35, no. 2, ll. 2, 3). The exact force of the title is
not clear, but in no case are we permitted to conclude as Amiaud does
(_Rec. of the Past_, N.S., i. 59) that Shid-lam-ta-udda is identical
with Nin-girsu.
[50] See Jensen, _Kosmologie der Babylonier_, pp. 476-87.
[51] See Jensen, _Kosmologie der Babylonier_,
|