FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635  
636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   >>   >|  
e whenever 'tis offered." These words convinced me that the bill was open to some grave objection which did not appear in the title, and which no historian had noticed. I found among the archives of the House of Lords the original parchment, endorsed with the words "Le Roy et La Royne s'aviseront." And it was clear at the first glance what the objection was.] There is a hiatus in that part of Narcissus Luttrell's Diary which relates to this matter. "The King," he wrote, "passed ten public bills and thirty-four private ones, and rejected that of the--"] As to the present practice of the House of Commons in such cases, see Hatsell's valuable work, ii. 356. I quote the edition of 1818. Hatsell says that many bills which affect the interest of the Crown may be brought in without any signification of the royal consent, and that it is enough if the consent be signified on the second reading, or even later; but that, in a proceeding which affects the hereditary revenue, the consent must be signified in the earliest stage.] [Footnote 202: The history of these ministerial arrangements I have taken chiefly from the London Gazette of March 3. and March 7. 1691/2 and from Narcissus Luttrell's Diary for that month. Two or three slight touches are from contemporary pamphlets.] [Footnote 203: William to Melville, May 22. 1690.] [Footnote 204: See the preface to the Leven and Melville Papers. I have given what I believe to be a true explanation of Burnet's hostility to Melville. Melville's descendant who has deserved well of all students of history by the diligence and fidelity with which he has performed his editorial duties, thinks that Burnet's judgment was blinded by zeal for Prelacy and hatred of Presbyterianism. This accusation will surprise and amuse English High Churchmen.] [Footnote 205: Life of James, ii. 468, 469.] [Footnote 206: Burnet, ii. 88.; Master of Stair to Breadalbane, Dee. 2. 1691.] [Footnote 207: Burnet, i. 418.] [Footnote 208: Crawford to Melville, July 23. 1689; The Master of Stair to Melville, Aug. 16. 1689; Cardross to Melville, Sept. 9. 1689; Balcarras's Memoirs; Annandale's Confession, Aug. i4. 1690.] [Footnote 209: Breadalbane to Melville, Sept. 17. 1690.] [Footnote 210: The Master of Stair to Hamilton, Aug. 17/27. 1691; Hill to Melville, June 26. 1691; The Master of Stair to Breadalbane, Aug. 24. 1691.] [Footnote 211: "The real truth is, they were a branch of the Macdonalds (who
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635  
636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Melville

 

Burnet

 

Master

 
consent
 
Breadalbane
 

Narcissus

 

Luttrell

 

history

 

signified


Hatsell

 

objection

 

Papers

 

preface

 

students

 

descendant

 

hostility

 

deserved

 

explanation

 

Hamilton


slight

 

Macdonalds

 

branch

 

touches

 

William

 
contemporary
 
pamphlets
 

performed

 

Balcarras

 

Memoirs


Churchmen

 

Annandale

 

Crawford

 

Cardross

 

English

 

duties

 

thinks

 

judgment

 

editorial

 

fidelity


blinded
 

surprise

 
Confession
 
accusation
 

Prelacy

 

hatred

 

Presbyterianism

 

diligence

 

revenue

 

glance