FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  
Correct 1820 1835 1872 1830 1861 1856 Within +-5 deg. {1812 1827 1865 1813 1815 1826 {1827 1842 1877 1866 1871 1868 Now the date at which it was most important to obtain the correct place was 1845 or thereabouts when it was proposed to look for the planet; but no special precaution seems to have been taken by either investigator to secure any advantage for this particular date. Criticising the procedure after the event (and of course this is a very unsatisfactory method of criticism), we should say that it would have been better to make several assumptions as regards the distance instead of relying upon Bode's Law; but no one, so far as I know, has ever taken the trouble to write out a satisfactory solution of the problem as it might have been conducted. Such a solution would be full of interest, though it could only have a small weight in forming our estimation of the skill with which the problem was solved in the first instance. [Sidenote: Le Verrier's erroneous limits.] Fourthly, we may notice a very curious point. Le Verrier went to some trouble not only to point out the most likely place for the planet, but to indicate limits outside which it was not necessary to look. This part of his work is specially commented upon with enthusiasm by Airy, and I will reproduce what he says. It is rather technical perhaps, but those who cannot follow the mathematics will be able to appreciate the tone of admiration. [Sidenote: The visible disc.] "M. Le Verrier then enters into a most ingenious computation of the limits between which the planet must be sought. The principle is this: assuming a time of revolution, all the other unknown quantities may be varied in such a manner that though the observations will not be so well represented as before, yet the errors of observation will be tolerable. At last, on continuing the variation of elements, one error of observation will be intolerably great. Then, by varying the elements in another way, we may at length make another error of observation intolerably great; and so on. If we compute, for all these different varieties of elements, the place of the planet for 1847, its _locus_ will evidently be a discontinuous curve or curvilinear polygon. If we do the same thing with different periodic times, we shall get different polygons; and the extreme per
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

planet

 
observation
 

elements

 

Verrier

 

limits

 

solution

 
problem
 

trouble

 

intolerably

 
Sidenote

mathematics

 
reproduce
 

computation

 

specially

 
commented
 
enthusiasm
 
enters
 

ingenious

 

follow

 
visible

technical

 

admiration

 

evidently

 

discontinuous

 

varieties

 

length

 

compute

 
curvilinear
 

polygon

 

polygons


extreme
 
periodic
 
varying
 

unknown

 

quantities

 
varied
 
revolution
 

sought

 

principle

 

assuming


manner

 
observations
 

continuing

 

variation

 

tolerable

 

errors

 

represented

 
precaution
 

investigator

 
special