FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  
rates prior to this date. First incarceration rates in 1970 and earlier were estimated to be 80% of each age-specific rate of first incarceration in 1974. If first incarceration rates in 1970 and earlier had averaged 90% of each age-specific first incarceration rate in 1974, the estimated number of adults alive in 2001 who had ever gone to prison would have been 1.9% higher (5,723,000). Alternatively, if earlier first incarceration rates had averaged 70% of 1974 rates, the estimated number of persons ever to have been incarcerated in 2001 would have been-1.9% lower (5,513,000). 4. Mortality rate schedules for prisoners were not available. Compared with the general population, mortality rates for prisoners were estimated to be 20% higher for adults under age 65, and the same for those age 65 and older. The estimate was based on the lower overall educational attainment of prisoners, and longitudinal studies documenting the relationship between mortality and educational attainment. If mortality rates for adults ever incarcerated, under age 65 were instead 40% higher than that of the general population, the estimated prevalence of ever having gone to prison in 2001 would be 5,567,000 (-0.9% less). If mortality rates for prisoners had been equal to that of the general population, the estimated prevalence would have been 0.9% higher in 2001 (5,670,000). 5. Comparable mortality rates prior to 1976 were not available. However, there is minimal effect of declining mortality rates since 1900 on the estimated number of persons ever incarcerated. Prevalence rates are only affected to the extent that there may have been a different decline in mortality among those ever incarcerated (the numerator) compared with all surviving members of a birth cohort (the denominator). Furthermore, prevalence rates were applied to estimates of the U.S. resident population (which fully reflect declines in mortality). 6. Age-specific incarceration rates do not incorporate a forecast of future rates of imprisonment, which may be affected by changes in criminal behavior, law enforcement, and in sentencing policies. Consequently, the lifetime likelihood of incarceration, 2001, and projected prevalence rates for 2002 and beyond may be different. A fuller description of the methodological techniques used in preparing this report is available upon request from the author. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  



Top keywords:

mortality

 
incarceration
 

estimated

 
prevalence
 

population

 

incarcerated

 
higher
 

prisoners

 

specific

 

general


earlier

 
number
 

adults

 

attainment

 

educational

 

affected

 

prison

 
averaged
 

persons

 

declines


reflect

 

denominator

 

members

 

surviving

 

compared

 
cohort
 
incorporate
 

estimates

 
applied
 

Furthermore


resident
 

Consequently

 

fuller

 

numerator

 
description
 

methodological

 

preparing

 

report

 
request
 

techniques


projected

 
author
 

criminal

 

behavior

 

future

 
imprisonment
 

enforcement

 
lifetime
 

likelihood

 

policies