FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>  
in its vague confusion, it probably does more than anything else to produce the sort of flicker and dazzle which are the first mental conditions for the reception of Hegel's system. The word 'negation' taken _simpliciter_ is treated as if it covered an indefinite number of {287} _secundums_, culminating in the very peculiar one of self-negation. Whence finally the conclusion is drawn that assertions are universally self-contradictory. As this is an important matter, it seems worth while to treat it a little minutely. When I measure out a pint, say of milk, and so determine it, what do I do? I virtually make two assertions regarding it,--it is this pint; it is not those other gallons. One of these is an affirmation, the other a negation. Both have a common subject; but the predicates being mutually exclusive, the two assertions lie beside each other in endless peace. I may with propriety be said to make assertions more remote still,--assertions of which those other gallons are the subject. As it is not they, so are they not the pint which it is. The determination "this is the pint" carries with it the negation,--"those are not the pints." Here we have the same predicate; but the subjects are exclusive of each other, so there is again endless peace. In both couples of propositions negation and affirmation are _secundum aliud_: this is _a_; this is n't not-_a_. This kind of negation involved in determination cannot possibly be what Hegel wants for his purposes. The table is not the chair, the fireplace is not the cupboard,--these are literal expressions of the law of identity and contradiction, those principles of the abstracting and separating understanding for which Hegel has so sovereign a contempt, and which his logic is meant to supersede. And accordingly Hegelians pursue the subject further, saying there is in every determination an element of real conflict. Do you not in determining the milk to be this pint exclude it forever from the chance of being those gallons, frustrate it from {288} expansion? And so do you not equally exclude them from the being which it now maintains as its own? Assuredly if you had been hearing of a land flowing with milk and honey, and had gone there with unlimited expectations of the rivers the milk would fill; and if you found there was but this single pint in the whole country,--the determination of the pint would exclude another determination which your mind had p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>  



Top keywords:

negation

 

assertions

 
determination
 

subject

 

exclude

 

gallons

 

exclusive

 

affirmation

 

endless

 

understanding


sovereign

 
separating
 
expressions
 

possibly

 
involved
 
purposes
 

identity

 

contradiction

 

principles

 

literal


fireplace

 

cupboard

 

abstracting

 

element

 

unlimited

 

expectations

 

flowing

 

Assuredly

 

hearing

 
rivers

country

 

single

 
maintains
 

pursue

 

Hegelians

 
supersede
 

conflict

 
expansion
 

equally

 
frustrate

chance

 

determining

 

forever

 
contempt
 

secundums

 

culminating

 
number
 

indefinite

 

simpliciter

 
treated