FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  
under British supervision. (3) We are prepared to surrender a part of our territory." What then happened can be told in the words of Lord Kitchener's telegram to the Secretary for War: "Lord Milner and I refused to accept these terms as a basis for negotiation, as they differ essentially from the principles laid down by His Majesty's Government. After a long discussion, nothing was decided, and it was determined to meet in the afternoon. The Commission met again at 4 p.m., when Lord Milner proposed a form of document that might be submitted to the burghers for a 'Yes' or 'No' vote. There was a good deal of objection to this, but it was agreed finally that Lord Milner should meet Smuts and Hertzog with a view of drafting, as far as possible, an acceptable document on the Botha lines.[331] They will meet to-morrow for that purpose. Lord Milner stipulated for the assistance of Sir Richard Solomon in the preparation of the draft document."[332] [Footnote 331: These were the "Middelburg terms" of a year ago. See note 2, p. 568.] [Footnote 332: Cd. 1,096.] The "long discussion" of May 19th, to which Lord Kitchener refers, is to be found in the minutes of the conferences held at Pretoria between May 19th and 28th. It affords an exhibition of gross disingenuousness on the part of the Boer commissioners. Almost in the same breath they allege that their proposal is "not necessarily in contradiction to"[333] the Middelburg terms; admit that there is a "fundamental difference" between the two proposals, but ask that their own may be accepted, nevertheless, as the basis of negotiation;[334] and finally maintain that, as it is "nearly equivalent"[335] to the Middelburg terms, they need not "insist so much" upon it.[336] To all this Lord Milner has but one answer: "It is impossible for us to take your proposal into consideration." [Footnote 333: Smuts.] [Footnote 334: Hertzog.] [Footnote 335: De Wet.] [Footnote 336: Botha.] [Sidenote: Payment of Boer war debts.] On May 21st the document drafted by Lord Milner and Sir R. Solomon in consultation with Mr. Smuts (General and ex-State Attorney of the Transvaal) and Mr. Hertzog (General and late Judge of the Free State High Court) on the preceding day, was read at a plenary meeting of the negotiators. In the main the document w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Milner

 

Footnote

 

document

 
Hertzog
 

Middelburg

 
General
 

discussion

 
finally
 

proposal

 
Solomon

negotiation

 
Kitchener
 
maintain
 
accepted
 

equivalent

 
insist
 

proposals

 

difference

 

commissioners

 
Almost

breath

 

territory

 
disingenuousness
 

affords

 

exhibition

 

allege

 

fundamental

 

prepared

 

surrender

 

necessarily


contradiction

 

Transvaal

 

Attorney

 
British
 

preceding

 

negotiators

 
meeting
 

plenary

 
supervision
 

consultation


consideration

 
impossible
 

answer

 
drafted
 

Sidenote

 

Payment

 
submitted
 

burghers

 

objection

 

essentially