FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>  
ntre of a sphere? No man who had clearly perceived the unity of God, could say with the Psalmist (lxxxvi. 8), 'Among the gods there is none like unto Thee, O Lord, neither are there any works like unto Thy works.' Though the same poet says, 'Thou art God alone,' he could not have compared God with other gods, if his idea of God had really reached that all-embracing character which it had with Abraham, Moses, Elijah, and Jeremiah. Nor would God have been praised as the 'great king above all gods' by a poet in whose eyes the gods of the heathen had been recognised as what they were--mighty shadows, thrown by the mighty works of God, and intercepting for a time the pure light of the Godhead. We thus arrive at a different conviction from that which M. Renan has made the basis of the history of the Semitic race. We can see nothing that would justify the admission of a monotheistic instinct, granted to the Semitic, and withheld from the Aryan race. They both share in the primitive intuition of God, they are both exposed to dangers in framing names for God, and they both fall into polytheism. What is peculiar to the Aryan race is their mythological phraseology, superadded to their polytheism; what is peculiar to the Semitic race is their belief in a national god--in a god chosen by his people as his people had been chosen by him. No doubt, M. Renan might say that we ignored his problem, and that we have not removed the difficulties which drove him to the admission of a monotheistic instinct. How is the fact to be explained, he might ask, that the three great religions of the world in which the unity of the Deity forms the key-note, are of Semitic origin, and that the Aryan nations, wherever they have been brought to a worship of the One God, invoke Him with names borrowed from the Semitic languages? But let us look more closely at the facts before we venture on theories. Mohammedanism, no doubt, is a Semitic religion, and its very core is monotheism. But did Mohammed invent monotheism? Did he invent even a new name of God? (Renan, p. 23.) Not at all. His object was to destroy the idolatry of the Semitic tribes of Arabia, to dethrone the angels, the Jin, the sons and daughters who had been assigned to Allah, and to restore the faith of Abraham in one God. (Renan, p. 37.) And how is it with Christianity? Did Christ come to preach a faith in a new God? Did He or His disciples invent a new name of God? No, Christ came not
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>  



Top keywords:

Semitic

 
invent
 
Abraham
 

monotheistic

 
admission
 
instinct
 

monotheism

 

mighty

 

people

 

chosen


peculiar

 

polytheism

 
Christ
 

religions

 
languages
 

difficulties

 

invoke

 
borrowed
 

disciples

 

worship


nations

 

origin

 

explained

 

brought

 

idolatry

 
tribes
 

Arabia

 

dethrone

 
destroy
 

object


angels

 

Christianity

 

restore

 

daughters

 
assigned
 

preach

 

venture

 

closely

 

theories

 
Mohammedanism

removed
 
Mohammed
 

religion

 

granted

 

reached

 

embracing

 

compared

 

character

 
praised
 

Elijah