FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   >>  
ng, are relatively paler, have a relatively longer tail and longer hindfeet, lesser condylobasilar length, and wider braincase. Most of these variations are of questionable significance; they may be chance variations owing to errors in sampling. Much of the south-central part of the state is relatively low and relatively arid. This area includes the arid basin of the Green River and its major tributaries and the arid Red Desert along the continental divide in Sweetwater County. This area might have acted as a barrier to the mice; gene flow might have been prevented between the populations of the western part of the state and those farther east in the Medicine Bow Mountains and Laramie Mountains. Nevertheless geographic variations of subspecific worth have not taken place. The barrier has either not been of as long duration, or has not been so complete and effective, as the other barriers in the state, namely the Absaroka Range, the Big Horn Basin, the Shoshone Basin, and the valley of the North Platte River. These four barriers presumably have led to the differentiation of the two subspecies that are newly named beyond. Each of the two areas which is set apart by these barriers and in which one of the newly named subspecies has evolved is small; therefore there is a lesser amount of suitable habitat available for each of the newly named mice than there is for _M. m. nanus_. It is conceivable, therefore, that in periods of adverse conditions in each of the small areas the size of the effective breeding population may have been so small that random genetic drift could have operated effectively, or that selection was more critical than in a larger, more stable population. It is difficult to test these possibilities because the selective value of the taxonomic characters is unknown. The observed pattern of variation and facts of distribution are, however, not contradictory to the above possibilities. _Specimens examined._--Total, 993, distributed as follows: All specimens unless otherwise indicated are in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History. Specimens in other museums are labeled as follows: Chicago Natural History Museum (Chi); University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology (Mich); American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); United States National Museum (USNM); Biological Surveys Collection (USBS). Localities that are not represented in Fig. 1 because overlapping or crowd
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   >>  



Top keywords:

Museum

 

barriers

 
History
 

Natural

 

variations

 

University

 

population

 

Specimens

 

barrier

 

effective


Mountains
 
lesser
 
subspecies
 

possibilities

 

longer

 

critical

 
stable
 

difficult

 

larger

 

periods


adverse
 

conditions

 

conceivable

 

breeding

 

operated

 

effectively

 

random

 

genetic

 

selection

 

Zoology


Michigan
 

Kansas

 

museums

 

labeled

 

Chicago

 

American

 

represented

 

Surveys

 

Collection

 

Biological


United
 

States

 

National

 

pattern

 

variation

 
Localities
 

distribution

 

observed

 

unknown

 

taxonomic