FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>  
l and considerable. That the absolute and relative number of eosinophil cells may markedly sink in certain complications of leukaemia, constitutes no exception to the law that the eosinophil cells are increased in myelogenic leukaemia. In this connexion the self-evident principle must be observed, that only analogous conditions are comparable. The standard of comparison for a leukaemic patient suffering from severe sepsis is not the blood of a healthy person with normal numerical proportions, but that of a patient similarly attacked by a severe sepsis. Now we know that in sepsis the number of eosinophil cells is enormously diminished, so that Zappert, in five cases of this nature, was unable to recognise any eosinophils in the blood. In contrast to this stands a case of myelogenic leukaemia described by Rieder and Mueller, complicated by a severe and lethally ending suppurative process. In consequence of the acute neutrophil leucocytosis brought about by the septic infection, the number of eosinophils sank rapidly from 3.5% to 0.43% (4 hours before death). The absolute number of eosinophil cells however in this terminal stage still amounted to 1400-1500 per mm.^{3}, and was therefore, in comparison with an uncomplicated sepsis, very much raised. Writers should not have disputed the importance of the eosinophil cells for the diagnosis of leukaemia from cases like these; on the contrary they should have seen in them a decisive confirmation of the constancy of the absolute increase of the eosinophils in leukaemic blood. At the time when Ehrlich formulated his proposition on the diagnostic importance of the eosinophil cells in leukaemia, the simple eosinophil leucocytosis (see p. 148), first discovered later by the investigation of asthma etc., was unknown. For no confusion can arise between leukaemia, and conditions accompanied by eosinophilia, as they can be distinguished on clinical grounds alone. The blood moreover provides ample means for a differential diagnosis: (1) the total increase of the white cells in this case seldom reaches degrees that remind one of leukaemia; (2) the eosinophil cells are exclusively polynuclear; (3) mast cells and neutrophil myelocytes are almost entirely absent. In favour of the diagnostic value of the absolute increase of the eosinophil cells are those cases too, where with a blood condition closely recalling leukaemia, the absence of eosinophil cells excludes the diagnosis of that di
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>  



Top keywords:
eosinophil
 

leukaemia

 

absolute

 

number

 

sepsis

 

increase

 

diagnosis

 

eosinophils

 

severe

 
patient

leukaemic

 
comparison
 

diagnostic

 
leucocytosis
 

neutrophil

 

myelogenic

 
conditions
 

importance

 

confusion

 
simple

proposition
 

investigation

 
unknown
 

discovered

 

asthma

 
constancy
 

considerable

 

contrary

 

Writers

 

disputed


decisive
 
Ehrlich
 

formulated

 

confirmation

 

absent

 

favour

 

myelocytes

 

exclusively

 
polynuclear
 

absence


excludes

 
recalling
 

closely

 

condition

 

remind

 
clinical
 

grounds

 

distinguished

 

raised

 

accompanied