FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>  
temperance work. "On behalf of the executive, "E. L. BOND, } "S. J. CARTER, } "A. M. FEATHERSTON, } _Committee_." "A. M. PHILLIPS, } "J. H. CARSON, } It will be noticed that in this letter the committee congratulate their friends upon "the satisfactory conclusion of this matter." Also at a meeting of the Executive of the Alliance before the above circular was issued the following resolution was adopted: "That this executive having heard the agreement and the report of the committee thereon, is satisfied with the same, and congratulate the temperance people of Canada on the result." It is often well for us to look at the bright side, and this was what the Alliance Committee determined on doing, and there surely were some encouraging features connected with this case. Nevertheless, as there are generally two sides which may be seen in such an affair, there were many of "the temperance people of Canada" who did not consider this conclusion satisfactory, and exchanged no congratulations, and it may do us no harm now to look briefly at some of the disappointing features in this settlement. First, it is said, "that the Company has entirely repudiated the offensive language used by Mr. Brady, and declares that it does not express the attitude of the Company towards the temperance cause." Now, Mr. Tait had taken precisely this same position in his letters to the Alliance Secretary, previous to the meeting with the committee, and even in the minutes of the meeting, as above given, it is said, "The Canadian Pacific Railway distinctly repudiate--_as they have done from the commencement of the discussion_--the expressions used by Assistant Superintendent Brady." In view of this it would seem that not much was gained by the meeting on this point. Secondly, we are told that "the Company also admits the right of its employees to engage in temperance work." It certainly was encouraging that this great Company should try to appear pleasing to the Alliance, and seemed to show that the Canadian Pacific Railway considered the temperance party a powerful factor in the land, but when we come to consider the manner in which the admission mentioned above was made, we can but see that it has a very doubtful side. Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>  



Top keywords:

temperance

 

meeting

 
Alliance
 

Company

 

committee

 
Canada
 

features

 
Canadian
 
Pacific
 

encouraging


Railway
 

people

 

congratulate

 

Committee

 

satisfactory

 

conclusion

 

executive

 

admission

 

mentioned

 
doubtful

manner
 

distinctly

 

repudiate

 
position
 
precisely
 

letters

 

minutes

 
Secretary
 

previous

 

pleasing


attitude
 

Secondly

 

employees

 
engage
 

admits

 

gained

 

expressions

 

Assistant

 

discussion

 
commencement

factor

 
Superintendent
 

considered

 
powerful
 
issued
 

resolution

 
circular
 

Executive

 

adopted

 
thereon