FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  
ing to the custom of the chace, no person could put to common more beasts than could be fed or wintered on the produce of the land which he held in the same chace; and because Robert brought his beasts from his lands which he held elsewhere, which beasts could not be fed or wintered on the land which he held within the chace, contrary to the usage and custom of the said chace, he (Richard) took them, &c....' "_Warwick_: 'Sir, first of all they avowed the taking, and said that we ought not to have any kind of common; and now they have admitted our right of common partially, viz. as to beasts which can be wintered ...' "_Gosefield_: 'The assise of forest is notorious and well-known to all, viz., that no man can have therein more beasts to common than can be fed off the said land.' "_Warwick_ (he spoke then for the King): 'Richard, do you claim to have assise of forest?' "_Gosefield_: 'Nay, sir. But King Henry granted and gave it to us to hold as a chace in the same manner as he held it while it was a royal forest; and we have three swain-motes yearly for searching and inquiring whether anyone puts more beasts therein than he ought to put; and, inasmuch as King Henry granted it to us to hold like as he held it, it seems to us that there is no need to take the Inquest.' "_Hertford_ [the judge]: 'Do you accept the averment or not?' "_Gosefield_ (being obliged to accept the averment) said: 'Sir, they were never seised of common for more beasts than could be wintered and fed and supported on the growth of the said land.'" There is appended to this report a note which lays down the law in a different sense from that before stated. It is as follows: "It is not sufficient for anyone who avows distress to say that he avows the taking, &c., for that he found the beasts in his chace of such a place, or in the common of such a place, where he had no right of common; for it may be that neither party had a right of common; and thus it is not sufficient but he must say that he found them in his several pasture, or must say some other thing that touches himself and gives him a right to impound what he found. For no man can avow a distress in a common pasture save the lord of the soil of the common pasture. For if any of the commoners were to make avowry for beasts taken in the common pasture it would then follow that if the Inquest were to pass against the plaintiff, he who avowed the taking in the common pasture would ha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  



Top keywords:

common

 

beasts

 

pasture

 

wintered

 
taking
 
Gosefield
 

forest

 

Inquest


granted

 

assise

 

custom

 
sufficient
 

avowed

 

Richard

 
Warwick
 

distress


accept
 
averment
 
person
 

report

 

stated

 

commoners

 
avowry
 

plaintiff


follow

 
impound
 

appended

 

touches

 
Robert
 
notorious
 
brought
 

contrary


admitted
 
partially
 

produce

 

Hertford

 

supported

 

growth

 
seised
 

obliged


manner

 
inquiring
 

searching

 

yearly