FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  
cs in assembling various machine details. A cylindrical part which is to be held in position by a shrinkage fit is first turned a few thousandths of an inch larger than the hole; the diameter of the latter is then increased by heating, and after the part is inserted, the heated outer member is cooled, causing it to grip the pin or shaft with tremendous pressure. General practice seems to favor a smaller allowance for shrinkage fits than for forced fits, although in many shops the allowances are practically the same in each case, and for some classes of work, shrinkage allowances exceed those for forced fits. In any case, the shrinkage allowance varies to a great extent with the form and construction of the part which has to be shrunk into place. The thickness or amount of metal around the hole is the most important factor. The way in which the metal is distributed also has an influence on the results. Shrinkage allowances for locomotive driving wheel tires adopted by the American Railway Master Mechanics Association are as follows: Center diameter, inches 38 44 50 56 62 66 Allowance, inches 0.040 0.047 0.053 0.060 0.066 0.070 Whether parts are to be assembled by forced or shrinkage fits depends upon conditions. For example, to press a driving wheel tire over its wheel center, without heating, would ordinarily be a rather awkward and difficult job. On the other hand, pins, etc., are easily and quickly forced into place with a hydraulic press and there is the additional advantage of knowing the exact pressure required in assembling, whereas there is more or less uncertainty connected with a shrinkage fit, unless the stresses are calculated. Tests to determine the difference in the quality of shrinkage and forced fits showed that the resistance of a shrinkage fit to slippage was, for an axial pull, 3.66 times greater than that of a forced fit, and in rotation or torsion, 3.2 times greater. In each comparative test, the dimensions and allowances were the same. The most important point to consider when calculating shrinkage fits is the stress in the hub at the bore, which depends chiefly upon the shrinkage allowance. If the allowance is excessive, the elastic limit of the material will be exceeded and permanent set will occur, or, in extreme cases, the ultimate strength of the metal will be exceeded and the hub will burst. CHAPTER IV THREAD CUTTING IN THE LATHE When t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

shrinkage

 

forced

 
allowances
 

allowance

 

driving

 
greater
 

inches

 
pressure
 
diameter
 

depends


important
 

heating

 

exceeded

 

assembling

 

determine

 

stresses

 

uncertainty

 

calculated

 

connected

 
ordinarily

awkward
 

difficult

 

center

 
advantage
 
knowing
 

required

 

additional

 
hydraulic
 

easily

 

quickly


extreme
 

ultimate

 

permanent

 
excessive
 

elastic

 

material

 

strength

 

CUTTING

 

CHAPTER

 
THREAD

chiefly

 
rotation
 

torsion

 
quality
 
showed
 

resistance

 
slippage
 

comparative

 

calculating

 
stress