FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206  
207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   >>   >|  
had those faculae chiefly or entirely on the left, 508 showed a nearly equal distribution, while 45 only had faculous appendages mainly on the right side.[455] Now the rotation of the sun, as we see it, is performed from left to right; so that the marked tendency of the faculae was a lagging one. This was easily accounted for by supposing the matter composing them to have been flung upwards from a considerable depth, whence it would reach the surface with the lesser _absolute_ velocity belonging to a smaller circle of revolution, and would consequently fall behind the cavities or "spots" formed by its abstraction. An attempt, it is true, made by M. Wilsing at Potsdam in 1888[456] to determine the solar rotation from photographs of faculae had an outcome inconsistent with this view of their origin. They unexpectedly gave a uniform period. No trace of the retardation poleward from the equator, shown by the spots, could be detected in their movements. But the experiment was obviously inconclusive;[457] and M. Stratonoff's[458] repetition of it with ampler materials gave a full assurance that faculae rotate like spots in periods lengthening as latitude augments. The ideas of M. Faye were, on two fundamental points, contradicated by the Kew investigators. He held spots to be regions of _uprush_ and of heightened temperature; they believed their obscurity to be due to a _downrush_ of comparatively cool vapours. Now M. Chacornac, observing, at Ville-Urbanne, March 6, 1865, saw floods of photospheric matter visibly precipitating themselves into the abyss opened by a great spot, and carrying with them small neighbouring maculae.[459] Similar instances were repeatedly noted by Father Secchi, who considered the existence of a kind of _suction_ in spots to be quite beyond question.[460] The tendency in their vicinity, to put it otherwise, is _centripetal_, not _centrifugal_; and this alone seems to negative the supposition of a central uprush. A fresh witness was by this time at hand. The application of the spectroscope to the direct examination of the sun's surface dates from March 4, 1866, when Sir Norman Lockyer (to give him his present title) undertook an inquiry into the cause of the darkening in spots.[461] It was made possible by the simple device of throwing upon the slit of the spectroscope an _image_ of the sun, any part of which could be subjected to special scrutiny, instead of, as had hitherto been done, admitting
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206  
207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
faculae
 

matter

 

uprush

 
spectroscope
 
tendency
 
surface
 

rotation

 

neighbouring

 

suction

 

considered


existence
 
maculae
 

repeatedly

 

Similar

 

Father

 

Secchi

 

instances

 

visibly

 

comparatively

 

vapours


Chacornac
 

observing

 

downrush

 
temperature
 

heightened

 
believed
 
obscurity
 

Urbanne

 

opened

 

carrying


precipitating

 

floods

 
photospheric
 
darkening
 

device

 
simple
 

inquiry

 

present

 

undertook

 

throwing


scrutiny

 

hitherto

 
admitting
 

special

 
subjected
 
Lockyer
 

negative

 

supposition

 
central
 

centrifugal