FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211  
212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   >>   >|  
ly subdued towards the end of the 17th century, and are now among the most peaceful of Russian peoples. See J.G. Gruelin, _Siberia_; Pierre Simon Pallas, _Sammlungen historischer Nachrichten ueber die mongolischen Volkerschaften_ (St Petersburg, 1776-1802); M.A. Castren, _Versuch einer buriatischen Sprachlehre_ (1857); Sir H.H. Howorth, _History of the Mongols_ (1876-1888). BURIDAN, JEAN [JOANNES BURIDANUS] (c. 1297-c. 1358), French philosopher, was born at Bethune in Artois. He studied in Paris under William of Occam. He was professor of philosophy in the university of Paris, was rector in 1327, and in 1345 was deputed to defend its interests before Philip of Valois and at Rome. He was more than sixty years old in 1358, but the year of his death is not recorded. The tradition that he was forced to flee from France along with other nominalists, and founded the university of Vienna in 1356, is unsupported and in contradiction to the fact that the university was founded by Frederick II. in 1237. An ordinance of Louis XI., in 1473, directed against the nominalists, prohibited the reading of his works. In philosophy Buridan was a rationalist, and followed Occam in denying all objective reality to universals, which he regarded as mere words. The aim of his logic is represented as having been the devising of rules for the discovery of syllogistic middle terms; this system for aiding slow-witted persons became known as the _pons asinorum_. The parts of logic which he treated with most minuteness are modal propositions and modal syllogisms. In commenting on Aristotle's _Ethics_ he dealt in a very independent manner with the question of free will, his conclusions being remarkably similar to those of John Locke. The only liberty which he admits is a certain power of suspending the deliberative process and determining the direction of the intellect. Otherwise the will is entirely dependent on the view of the mind, the last result of examination. The comparison of the will unable to act between two equally balanced motives to an ass dying of hunger between two equal and equidistant bundles of hay is not found in his works, and may have been invented by his opponents to ridicule his determinism. That he was not the originator of the theory known as "liberty of indifference" (_liberum arbitrium indifferentiae_) is shown in G. Fonsegrive's _Essai sur le libre arbitre_, pp. 119, 199 (1887). His works are:--_Summula de dialectica_ (
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211  
212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

university

 

philosophy

 

liberty

 

nominalists

 

founded

 

syllogisms

 
commenting
 
propositions
 

arbitre

 

treated


minuteness

 

Aristotle

 

liberum

 

indifference

 

independent

 

arbitrium

 

Fonsegrive

 

Ethics

 

indifferentiae

 
asinorum

discovery

 

syllogistic

 

devising

 

Summula

 

represented

 

witted

 

persons

 

theory

 
aiding
 

middle


system

 

dialectica

 

manner

 

bundles

 

dependent

 
Otherwise
 

equidistant

 

result

 

balanced

 

equally


motives

 
hunger
 

examination

 

comparison

 

unable

 

intellect

 
invented
 

similar

 

remarkably

 
question