FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283  
284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   >>   >|  
elative to their masses. Therefore, according to the Law of Gravity, as regards the masses of bodies, Jupiter and the sun should be nearer together than Mercury and the sun, because their attractive powers are greater, and the earth and the sun should be nearer together than Mercury and the sun, because their joint attractive powers are also greater. In the same way it can be proved that all the other planets whose masses are greater than Mercury ought, according to the Law of Gravity in regard to masses only, to be nearer to the sun than what Mercury is, simply because the total attractive forces between any two are greater than the attractive force between Mercury and the sun. The respective masses of the planets compared with the sun, taking the mass of the sun as unity, are as follows-- Jupiter 1/1,048 of mass of sun. Saturn 1/3,529 " " Neptune 1/18,520 " " Uranus 1/22,020 " " Earth 1/324,439 " " Venus 1/397,000 " " Mars 1/2,994,790 " " Mercury 1/7,636,440 " " Therefore, if the total attractive force of gravity is equal to the product of the masses of any two bodies, then the planets ought to be in the following order in relation to their distance from the sun: Jupiter, first, followed by Saturn, Neptune, Uranus, Earth, Venus, Mars and Mercury; that being the order in which the attractive power of gravity is regulated by their respective masses. Yet the very opposite is nearly the case, as we find that some of the further planets, as Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, possess greater masses than any of the nearer planets; so that here we have a distinct violation of the Law of Gravitation Attraction, which states that the attraction between any two bodies is directly as the product of their masses, because we find certain bodies with greater attracting powers further away from the sun, than other planets possessing less attracting powers, because of their smaller masses. I cannot recall having ever read of any explanation which has been given for such an anomaly, and indeed this apparent violation admits of no other explanation than the conception of the dual character of the so-called Law of Universal Gravitation, which includes a repelling or repulsive force or motion, such motion being due to the pressure of the universal Aether. Thus in the light of the centrifugal motion, combined with the fact that Aether is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283  
284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

masses

 

Mercury

 
greater
 

attractive

 
planets
 

bodies

 

powers

 
Jupiter
 

nearer

 

Uranus


motion

 

Neptune

 

Saturn

 
attracting
 

product

 

gravity

 
explanation
 

respective

 

Aether

 

Gravity


violation
 

Therefore

 
Gravitation
 
possessing
 

smaller

 
Attraction
 

recall

 

distinct

 

states

 

attraction


possess

 

directly

 

conception

 
repulsive
 

repelling

 

includes

 

called

 

Universal

 

pressure

 

universal


combined

 

centrifugal

 
character
 

anomaly

 

admits

 

apparent

 

compared

 

forces

 

simply

 
taking