FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   >>  
ently_, an unpatriotic stand, in assuming that the only way in which we can participate in ocean steam navigation is by adopting a system of reciprocity with England in so changing our laws that we may buy her steamers as she now buys our sailing ships, because she finds it for her interest to do so." These views, _entertained twenty-one years ago_, were applicable then. They have been applicable ever since--they are applicable now. They have been the staple of all that I have ever written on the subject before the war, during the war, and since its termination. Iron steamship building was in its infancy in 1857. Its great development was merely coincident with our civil war. That war was a horrid nightmare. We found that our navigation interests, with many other things we could ill afford to lose, the lives of hundreds of thousands of our young men, vast sums of our money, and not a little of our morality, were gone. Those lives can never be restored, while our money may be regained, and it is to be hoped our morality may be improved, but as to our ships, we simply refuse to replace them with those that are better. One argument in opposition to free ships is founded upon the injustice that would be done to our shipbuilders. Were this true, it might be said that ship-owners and the general public have some rights that shipbuilders are bound to respect. The interests of our whole people are paramount to theirs as were those of the English people in 1849, when the proportion of their shipbuilders was greatly beyond that of ours at this day. In point of fact, however, the suffering of our shipbuilders by the repeal of the navigation laws, would, from the first, be scarcely appreciable, and, in the end, would be more than compensated by increased business. It would matter very little either to the builders of wooden vessels or to the public if that provision of the statute which touches that department, and which really was intended for that alone, should be repealed or not. Our mechanics build mainly for the coasting trade, and they build wooden vessels so good, and at such low prices, on account of the material at their hands, that there is little danger of any competition with them on the part of foreigners. We never had any reason, and probably never shall have, to fear the rivalry of other nations in this particular line of business. So long as it constituted the only method of construct
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   >>  



Top keywords:

shipbuilders

 

applicable

 

navigation

 

people

 
public
 

interests

 

business

 

morality

 

vessels

 

wooden


nations

 

rivalry

 

repeal

 
greatly
 
suffering
 
proportion
 

method

 

respect

 

rights

 

owners


general

 

construct

 

constituted

 
scarcely
 

paramount

 

English

 
repealed
 
danger
 

mechanics

 
intended

prices
 

account

 
coasting
 

material

 
department
 

touches

 

increased

 
reason
 

matter

 

compensated


appreciable

 
provision
 

statute

 

competition

 
builders
 

foreigners

 

staple

 

written

 
entertained
 

twenty