ce is an occasion for, not an
agent of, creation_.
FOOTNOTES:
[65] See above, Chapter II.
[66] Some of these and the following figures are borrowed from
Oelzelt-Newin, _op. cit._, pp. 70 ff.
[67] Compare the well-known theory of Dr. Hughlings-Jackson. (Tr.)
[68] For an elaborate and interesting discussion of this subject,
see Tolstoi's _Physiology of War_. As showing the later trend of
thought on this general theme, see the excellent summary by
Professor Seligman, _The Economic Interpretation of History_. (Tr.)
[69] William James, _The Will to Believe and other Essays_, pp. 218
ff.; Jastrow, _Psych. Rev._, May, 1898, p. 307; J. Royce, _ibid._,
March, 1898; Baldwin, _Social and Ethical Interpretations_, etc.
[70] Joly, _Psychologie des grands hommes_.
[71] Osborn, _From the Greeks to Darwin_.
[72] Such, according to Binet and Passy, seem to be the cases of the
Goncourts, Pailleron, etc. See "Psychologie des auteurs
dramatiques," in _L'annee psychologique_, I, 96.
[73] Compare the striking instance of this moment as given by
Froebel, in his _Autobiography_, in connection with his idea of the
Kindergarten. (Tr.)
[74] Quoted by Arreat, _Memoire et Imagination_, p. 118. (Paris, F.
Alcan.)
[75] Paulhan ("De l'invention," _Rev. Philos._, December, 1898, pp.
590 ff.) distinguishes three kinds of development in invention: (1)
Spontaneous or reasoned--the directing idea persists to the end; (2)
transformation, which comprises several contradictory evolutions
succeeding and replacing one another in consequence of impressions
and feelings; (3) deviation, which is a composite of the two
preceding forms.
[76] Cf. the well-known doctrine of Empedocles. (Tr.)
[77] P. Souriau, _Theorie de l'invention_, pp. 6-7.
CHAPTER V
LAW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE IMAGINATION
Is imagination, so often called "a capricious faculty," subject to some
law? The question thus asked is too simple, and we must make it more
precise.
As the direct cause of invention, great or small, the imagination acts
without assignable determination; in this sense it is what is known as
"spontaneity"--a vague term, which we have attempted to make clear. Its
appearance is irreducible to any law; it results from the often
fortuitous convergence of various factors previously studied.
Leaving aside the moment of origin, does the inventive power, considered
in its individual and specific development, seem to follow any law, or,
|