FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274  
275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>  
world, why convert it into every other thing? Surely, for no better reason than that there has not occurred to this mineralist any other way of explaining certain natural appearances which aqueous solution could not produce. Here is no dispute about a matter of fact; it is on all hands allowed, that in certain cavities, inaccessible to any thing but heat and cold, we find mineral concretions, which contain no water, and which, according to the known operations of nature, water could not have produced; must we therefore have recourse to water acting according to no known principle, that is to say, are we to explain nature by a preternatural cause? [Note 43: Water is now considered by men of science, as a compound substance; this doctrine, which seems to follow so necessarily from the experiments of the French philosophers, must be tried by the growing light of chemical science. In the oxygenating operation of inflammable and combustible bodies when burning, those ingenious chemists overlooked the operation of _phlogistic matter_, which has no weight, and which escapes on that occasion, as I have had occasion to show in a dissertation upon phlogiston, and in the Philosophy of Light, Heat, and Fire. How far this view, which I have given of those interesting experiments, may lead to the explanation of other collateral phenomena, such as that of the water produced, I will not pretend to conjecture. One thing is evident, that if the weight of the water, procured in burning inflammable and vital air, be equal to that of those two gasses, we would then have reason to conclude, either that water were a compound substance, or that vital air, and inflammable vapour were compounds of water and the matter of light, or solar substance.] I dare say that this is not the view that M. Monnet takes of the subject, when he thinks to explain to himself the concretion of those different substances by means of water; but, according to my apprehension of the matter, his theory, when sifted to the bottom, will bear no other construction; and, unless he shall consider water like the matter of heat, as capable of producing the fluidity of fusion, and of being also again abstracted from the fluid, by pervading the most solid body, which would then be a substance different from water, he must employ this aqueous substance as a menstruum or solvent for solid bodies, in the same manner as has been done by those naturalists whom he he justly censu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274  
275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>  



Top keywords:

substance

 

matter

 

inflammable

 
operation
 

explain

 

burning

 

bodies

 

nature

 

produced

 

weight


science
 

aqueous

 

compound

 
reason
 

experiments

 

occasion

 

compounds

 

vapour

 

pretend

 

conjecture


phenomena
 

collateral

 

explanation

 

evident

 

gasses

 
procured
 
conclude
 

naturalists

 

producing

 

fluidity


fusion
 

manner

 

capable

 

solvent

 

employ

 

pervading

 
abstracted
 

construction

 

concretion

 
substances

menstruum

 
thinks
 

subject

 
justly
 

bottom

 

sifted

 

interesting

 

apprehension

 

theory

 

Monnet