FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>  
ciation work in either direction, or only from the one which has occurred earlier to the one which has occurred later? In an article by Mr. Wohlgemuth, called "The Direction of Associations" ("British Journal of Psychology," vol. v, part iv, March, 1913), it is claimed to be proved by experiment that, in so far as motor memory (i.e. memory of movements) is concerned, association works only from earlier to later, while in visual and auditory memory this is not the case, but the later of two neighbouring experiences may recall the earlier as well as the earlier the later. It is suggested that motor memory is physiological, while visual and auditory memory are more truly psychological. But that is not the point which concerns us in the illustration. The point which concerns us is that a law of association, established by purely psychological observation, is a purely psychological law, and may serve as a sample of what is possible in the way of discovering such laws. It is, however, still no more than a rough generalization, a statistical average. It cannot tell us what will result from a given cause on a given occasion. It is a law of tendency, not a precise and invariable law such as those of physics aim at being. If we wish to pass from the law of habit, stated as a tendency or average, to something more precise and invariable, we seem driven to the nervous system. We can more or less guess how an occurrence produces a change in the brain, and how its repetition gradually produces something analogous to the channel of a river, along which currents flow more easily than in neighbouring paths. We can perceive that in this way, if we had more knowledge, the tendency to habit through repetition might be replaced by a precise account of the effect of each occurrence in bringing about a modification of the sort from which habit would ultimately result. It is such considerations that make students of psychophysiology materialistic in their methods, whatever they may be in their metaphysics. There are, of course, exceptions, such as Professor J. S. Haldane,* who maintains that it is theoretically impossible to obtain physiological explanations of psychical phenomena, or physical explanations of physiological phenomena. But I think the bulk of expert opinion, in practice, is on the other side. *See his book, "The New Physiology and Other Addresses" (Charles Griffin & Co., 1919). The question whether it is possible
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>  



Top keywords:
memory
 

earlier

 

tendency

 
precise
 

psychological

 

physiological

 

concerns

 

neighbouring

 

occurrence

 

produces


repetition

 
phenomena
 

explanations

 
average
 
invariable
 

auditory

 

purely

 

result

 

occurred

 

visual


association

 

considerations

 

ultimately

 

bringing

 

modification

 
psychophysiology
 

metaphysics

 

methods

 

materialistic

 

students


account

 

currents

 
easily
 

analogous

 

channel

 

perceive

 

replaced

 

knowledge

 

effect

 

opinion


practice
 
Physiology
 

question

 

Griffin

 

Addresses

 
Charles
 

expert

 
Haldane
 
maintains
 

exceptions