[4] _Ibid._, ch. IV, sect. I. See also ch. II.
[5] _Ibid._, ch. VII, sect. II.
[6] _Ibid._, ch. VI.
[7] _Ibid._, ch. VII, sect. II.
[8] _Ibid._, ch. VII, sect. II.
[9] James Mason, "Master of Artes," whose _Anatomie of Sorcerie_
("printed at London by John Legatte, Printer to the Universitie of
Cambridge," 1612), puts him next to Perkins in chronological order,
needs only mention in passing. He takes the reality of sorcery for
granted, and devotes himself to argument against its use.
[10] _... Shewing the True and Right Methode of the Discovery._ Cotta
was familiar with the more important trials of his time. He knew of the
Warboys, Lancaster, and York trials and he probably had come into close
contact with the Northampton cases. He had read, too, several of the
books on the subject, such as Scot, Wier, and Perkins. His omission of
King James's work is therefore not only curious but significant. A
second edition of his book was published in 1625.
[11] See _Triall of Witchcraft_, ch. XIV.
[12] See _ibid._, p. 48.
[13] _Ibid._, 66-67.
[14] See _ibid._, ch. VI. Cotta speaks of the case as six years earlier.
[15] _Ibid._, 62, 66.
[16] _A Short Discoverie_, 70.
[17] _Triall of Witchcraft_, 83-84.
[18] _A Short Discoverie_, 51-53.
[19] _Triall of Witchcraft_, 70.
[20] Roberts's explanation of the proneness of women to witchcraft
deserves mention in passing. Women are more credulous, more curious,
"their complection is softer," they have "greater facility to fall,"
greater desire for revenge, and "are of a slippery tongue." _Treatise of
Witchcraft_, 42-43.
[21] "In Cheshire and Coventry," he tells us. "Hath not Coventrie," he
asks (p. 16), "beene usually haunted by these hellish Sorcerers, where
it was confessed by one of them, that no lesse than three-score were of
that confedracie?... And was I not there enjoyned by a necessity to the
discoverie of this Brood?"
[22] For the whole case see Howell, _State Trials_, II.
[23] See article on Bernard in _Dict. Nat. Biog._
[24] See below, appendix C, list of witch cases, under 1626.
[25] See _Guide to Grand-Jurymen_, Dedication.
[26] _Ibid._, 11-12.
[27] _Ibid._, 53.
[28] _Ibid._, 214.
[29] This he did on the authority of a repentant Mr. Edmonds, of
Cambridge, who had once been questioned by the University authorities
for witchcraft. _Ibid._, 136-138.
[30] _Guide to Grand-Jurymen_, 22-28.
[31] He was "for the law, but
|