FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   >>  
conceptions on the great subjects which have _occupied and_ absorbed the most glorious _of human_ understandings." The article in "The New Monthly" is on "The State of Parties." The italics are mine. Apparent plagiarisms frequently arise from an author's self-repetition. He finds that something he has already published has fallen dead--been overlooked--or that it is peculiarly _a propos_ to another subject now under discussion. He therefore introduces the passage; often without allusion to his having printed it before; and sometimes he introduces it into an anonymous article. An anonymous writer is thus, now and then, unjustly accused of plagiarism--when the sin is merely that of self-repetition. In the present case, however, there has been a deliberate plagiarism of the silliest as well as meanest species. Trusting to the obscurity of his original, the plagiarist has fallen upon the idea of killing two birds with one stone--of dispensing with all disguise but that of _decoration_. Channing says "order"--the writer in the New Monthly says "grade." The former says that this order is "far from holding," etc.--the latter says it is "_very_ far from holding." The one says that military talent is "_not_ conversant," and so on--the other says "it is _never made_ conversant." The one speaks of "the highest and richest objects"--the other of "the more delicate and abstruse." Channing speaks of "thought"--the thief of "mental operations." Chaming mentions "intelligence of the _highest_ order"--the thief will have it of "the highest _and rarest_." Channing observes that military talent is often "_almost_ wholly wanting," etc.--the thief maintains it to be "_wholly_ wanting." Channing alludes to "_large_ views of human nature"--the thief can be content with nothing less than "enlarged" ones. Finally, the American having been satisfied with a reference to "subjects which have absorbed the most glorious understandings," the Cockney puts him to shame at once by discoursing about "subjects which have _occupied and_ absorbed the most glorious _of human_ understandings"--as if one could be absorbed, without being occupied, by a subject--as if "_of_" were here any thing more than two superfluous letters--and as if there were any chance of the reader's supposing that the understandings in question were the understandings of frogs, or jackasses, or Johnny Bulls. By the way, in a case of this kind, whenever th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   >>  



Top keywords:
understandings
 

Channing

 

absorbed

 
occupied
 

highest

 

glorious

 

subjects

 

holding

 

military

 

talent


speaks

 
plagiarism
 

wanting

 
conversant
 
wholly
 

introduces

 

writer

 

anonymous

 

repetition

 

fallen


article

 

Monthly

 

subject

 

mental

 

operations

 
supposing
 

question

 

Chaming

 

mentions

 

reader


intelligence

 

jackasses

 
abstruse
 

objects

 

richest

 

delicate

 

Johnny

 

rarest

 

thought

 

observes


enlarged
 
superfluous
 

Finally

 

American

 

Cockney

 
reference
 

satisfied

 
content
 
maintains
 

discoursing