FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  
on education, which stated something on the order of people in the United States are receiving 10% more of a certain level of education, than they were a decade before. The years and the exact figures have been altered to protect those responsible from embarrassment. For example: let us presume the report stated: Graduation From Grade School was up 5% from 1981 to 1991. You would think from this report that the average kid had 5% greater chances of getting a Grade School Diploma in 91 than in 81. . .but. . .it turns out that it was just the opposite because the population was 1.097352 times larger in 91, than it had been in 1981. . .which is about 10% larger, thus in a "real education" sense, in the same way the monetary reports are given in "real dollars" or "constant dollars," education was actually moving in just the opposite direction, and thus was DOWN about 5% instead of UP about 5% from 1981 to 1991. Remember, these were not from years quoted in the report and the figures were not exactly 5% or 10% respectively, nor the diploma referred to was not a Grade School Diploma, but they are pretty close to being exact, in terms of the percentages and years; much closer than you might expect. ***Here is a footnote explanation of how to be more exact*** To be exact, one would have to do a demographic analysis, of the specific portions of the population of the ages at which such diplomas were conferred, as it would be irrelevant from a realistic point of view to measure the population on whole bases if you were only concerned with people who were of the age to receive Kindergarten Diplomas between 1981 and 1991-- or whatever ages and a whatever kind of diploma. Thus these figures are not as precise as they could be, but still given the trends of population and education, it is obvious that a trend in one is not following the direction of the other. A further look at the US Census figures averaged below will be sufficient to inform you that previous generations that were measured had even greater growth rates than 10%, so that the number of people getting any specific degrees or diplomas in the following decades should have been going up even more. *** In the tables below, the first line shows the Base Year: or "The Year In Question" labeled "YEAR: ####" so if you want a chart based on 1980 as the base year, you simply search/find "YEAR: 1980" to find the relevant portions. Once you have located
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

education

 

figures

 

population

 

report

 

School

 

people

 

Diploma

 

greater

 

diplomas

 
diploma

opposite
 

larger

 

portions

 
direction
 

dollars

 

specific

 
stated
 

precise

 
trends
 

obvious


Diplomas
 

concerned

 

receive

 

Kindergarten

 

measure

 

number

 

Question

 

labeled

 

tables

 

relevant


located

 

search

 

simply

 
sufficient
 

inform

 

averaged

 

Census

 
previous
 

generations

 
degrees

decades
 
realistic
 

measured

 

growth

 

average

 

presume

 

Graduation

 

chances

 
097352
 

receiving