FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  
Artificial_ dayes as contradistinguished to nights, yet that the _Natural_ Days, reckoning from noon to noon, are all _equal_: But _Astronomers_ know well, that even these dayes are _unequal_. For, this _Natural_ Day is measured _not onely_ by one intire conversion of the _AEquinoctial_, or 24. _AEquinoctial_ hours, (which is indeed taken to be performed in equal times,) _but_ increases by so much, as answers to that part of the _Sun's_ (or _Earths_,) Annual motion as is performed in that time. For, when that part of the _AEquinoctial_, which (with the _Sun_) was the _Meridian_ yesterday at noon, is come thither again to day, it is not yet _Noon_ (because the Sun is not now at the place where yesterday he was, but is gone forward about one degree, more or less) but we must stay till that place, where the _Sun_ now is, comes to the _Meridian_ before it be now _Noon_. Now this Additament (above the 24 _AEquinoctial_ hours, or intire conversion of the _AEquinoctial_) is upon a double account {278} unequal. _First_, because the Sun, by reason of its _Apogaeum_ and _Perigaeum_, doth not at all times of the year dispatch in one day an equal Arch of the _Ecliptick_; but greater Arches neer the _Perigaeum_, which is about the middle of _December_; and lesser neer the _Apogaeum_, which is about the middle of _June_: As will appear sufficiently by the _Tables_ of the Sun's Annual motion. _Secondly_, though the Sun should in the _Ecliptick_ move alwaies at the same rate; yet equal Arches of the _Ecliptick_ do not in all parts of the _Zodiack_ answer to equal Arches of the _AEquinoctial_, by which we are to estimate time: Because some parts of it, as about the two _Solsticial_ Points, lie nearer to a _parallel_ position to the _AEquinoctial_, than others, as those about the two _AEquinoctial_ points, where the _Ecliptick_ and _AEquinoctial_ do intersect; whereupon an Arch of the _Ecliptick_, neer the _Solsticial_ points answers to a greater Arch of the _AEquinoctial_, than an Arch equal thereunto neer the _AEquinoctial_ points: As doth sufficiently appear by the _Tables_ of the Suns _right Ascension_. According to the _first_ of these causes, we should have the longest _natural_ daies in _December_, and the shortest in _June_, which if it did operate alone, would give us at those times two _Annual_ High-waters. According to the _second_ cause, if operating singly, we should have the longest daies at the two Solstices in _Jun
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

AEquinoctial

 

Ecliptick

 

Arches

 
Annual
 

points

 

Meridian

 

motion

 

Solsticial

 

Perigaeum

 

According


yesterday
 

Apogaeum

 

performed

 
middle
 

December

 

unequal

 

Tables

 

sufficiently

 

Natural

 

greater


answers
 

longest

 

conversion

 

intire

 

Because

 
estimate
 
Zodiack
 

alwaies

 

answer

 

operate


waters
 

Solstices

 

singly

 

operating

 

shortest

 

intersect

 
position
 

parallel

 

nearer

 
thereunto

natural

 
Ascension
 

Points

 
increases
 

Earths

 

thither

 

measured

 

reckoning

 

nights

 

contradistinguished