FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
d artificial respiration kept up, all the functions of life may be greatly prolonged; and if curare be used, the creature does not die, although it feels. Supposing that morphia or chloroform be administered at the same time--is the animal, notwithstanding, conscious of pain? Professor Starling admitted in his evidence that if the anaesthetic passed off, the curarized animal would be unable to move or to show any sign of suffering; there would be no possibility of a dog whining or moaning; "it could not, under curare," he frankly admits. Dr. Thane, one of the Government inspectors of laboratories, gave interesting evidence on this point, in reply to questions of one of the Commissioners. "What is the object of giving curare when you are going to give an anaesthetic?" "The object of giving curare is to stop all reflex movements...." "It would stop all struggling, would it not?" "IT WOULD STOP ALL STRUGGLING." "That is to say, it would put an end to the usual signs of the animal not being properly under anaesthesia?" "That is so." "And in that case the experimenter has to depend solely, not upon the attendant, but upon the accuracy of his apparatus? He cannot tell from looking at the animal, which is perfectly still, whether it is suffering or not?" "If his apparatus breaks down, the animal will die of suffocation; it will not get air." "Yes, it may die; but so long as it is alive, HE could not say, YOU could not say, I could not say--if I were present--that the animal was properly under anaesthesia, IF THERE WERE NO SIGNS BY WHICH YOU CAN TELL?" "We could say the animal is respiring air which is charged with anaesthetic in sufficient quantity to keep it anaesthetized before we gave it curare." "That is all you could say?" "That is all we could say."[1] [1] Evidence taken November 21, 1906. And this pious opinion Dr. Thane reiterates to other questioners. It fails to satisfy except where faith is strong. "The curious thing to me," said Dr. George Wilson, "is that you or anyone else can say positively that an animal which cannot, by moving, give any indication that it is not completely anaesthetized during all this time that it is under a terribly severe operation does not suffer.... I cannot understand such a positive statement." And after Dr. Starling had admitted the impossibility of a dog, under curare, making any cry, Dr. Wilson rejoins: "THEN HOW CAN YOU TELL THAT IT SUFFERS NO PA
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

animal

 

curare

 

anaesthetic

 

suffering

 

object

 

giving

 

anaesthetized

 

properly

 
Wilson
 

admitted


apparatus

 

Starling

 

anaesthesia

 

evidence

 

present

 

sufficient

 

charged

 
quantity
 

respiring

 

suffer


operation
 

understand

 

positive

 

severe

 

terribly

 

moving

 

indication

 

completely

 

statement

 

SUFFERS


rejoins

 

impossibility

 

making

 
positively
 

reiterates

 
questioners
 

satisfy

 

opinion

 

November

 

George


strong

 
curious
 
Evidence
 
curarized
 

unable

 

passed

 
conscious
 

Professor

 

frankly

 

admits