FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   >>  
new thought entered my mind, whence others, differing from the first, arose; and as I roamed from one to another I was tempted to close my eyes, and thought was changed into a dream. [34] See the theory by Lotze of local signs in the formation of the idea of space, completed and modified by Wundt and others. [35] Sometimes the name of a person, or of some part of the human form, has been bestowed on a natural object without reference to their analogy, but in this case the epithet has the converse effect of leading us to imagine that it possesses the features or limbs of the human form. And this is of equal value for our present inquiry. [36] While these sheets were passing through the press, I was informed of Berg's work on the Enjoyment of Music. ("_Die Lust an der Musik._" Berlin, 1879.) Berg, who is a realist, inquires what is the source of the pleasure we experience from the regular succession of sounds, which he holds to be the primary essence of music. He finds the cause in some of Darwin's theories and researches. Darwin observes that the epoch of song coincides with that of love in the case of singing animals, birds, insects, and some mammals; and from this Berg concludes that primitive men, or rather anthropoids, made use of the voice to attract the attention of females. Hence a relation was established between singing and the sentiments of love, rivalry, and pleasure; this relation was indissolubly fused into the nature by heredity, and it persisted even after singing ceased to be excited by its primitive cause. This applies to the general sense of pleasure in music. We have next to inquire why the ear prefers certain sounds to others, certain combinations to others, etc. Berg holds that it depends on negative causes, that the ear does not select the most pleasing but the least painful sounds. He relies on Helmholtz's fundamental theory of sounds. It seems to me that although Helmholtz's theory is true, that of Berg is erroneous, since he is quite unable to prove his assertion that the effect produced by music is a negative pleasure. Moreover, the Darwinian observations to which he traces the origin of the enjoyment of music, not only rely on an arbitrary hypothesis, but do not explain why males should derive any advantage from their voice, nor what pleasure and satisfaction females find in it. And this, as Reinach justly observes in the _Revue Philosophique_, is the point on which the problem turns. C
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   >>  



Top keywords:

pleasure

 

sounds

 

theory

 

singing

 

Helmholtz

 

negative

 
effect
 
thought
 

Darwin

 

primitive


females

 

relation

 

observes

 

applies

 

depends

 

inquire

 

combinations

 

general

 

prefers

 
nature

established

 

attention

 

attract

 

anthropoids

 

sentiments

 

rivalry

 

ceased

 

excited

 
persisted
 

indissolubly


heredity

 

explain

 

derive

 

hypothesis

 

arbitrary

 
origin
 

enjoyment

 

advantage

 

Philosophique

 

problem


justly

 
satisfaction
 

Reinach

 

traces

 

observations

 

relies

 
painful
 

fundamental

 

pleasing

 
select