FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  
lusion, a sophism in legislation is not a mere abstraction; it must speedily bear fruit in material results of the most disastrous nature, and I implore your honorable committee, in behalf of our common country, not to open a Pandora's box by way of experiment from whence so much evil must issue, and which once opened may never again be closed. Very respectfully, MADELEINE VINTON DAHLGREN. Mrs. Dahlgren was ably reviewed by Virginia L. Minor of St. Louis, and the Toledo Woman Suffrage Association. Mrs. Minor said: In assuming to speak for the "silent masses" of women, Mrs. Dahlgren declares that silence does not give consent; very inconsequently forgetting, that if it does not on one side of the question, it may not on the other, and that she may no more represent them than do we. The Toledo society, through its president Mrs. Rose L. Segur, said: We agree with you that this grave question is not one of expediency. It is simply one of right and justice, and therefore a most legitimate subject for agitation. As a moral force woman must have a voice in the government, or partial and unjust legislation is the result from which arise the evils consequent upon a government based upon the enslavement of half its citizens. To this Mrs. Dahlgren replied briefly, charging the ladies with incapacity to comprehend her. The week following the convention a hearing was granted by the House Judiciary Committee to Dr. Mary Walker of Washington, Mary A. Tillotson of New Jersey and Mrs. N. Cromwell of Arkansas, urging a report in favor of woman's enfranchisement. On January 28, the House sub-committee on territories granted a hearing to Dr. Mary Walker and Sara Andrews Spencer, in opposition to the bill proposing the disfranchisement of the women of Utah as a means of suppressing polygamy. On January 30 the House Judiciary Committee granted Mrs. Hooker a hearing. Of the eleven members of the committee nearly all were present.[32] The room and all the corridors leading to it were crowded with men and women eager to hear Mrs. Hooker's speech. At the close of the two hours occupied in its delivery, Chairman Knott thanked her in the name of the committee for her able argument. Immediately after this hearing Mr. Frye of Maine, in presenting in the House of Repres
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187  
188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
hearing
 

committee

 

granted

 
Dahlgren
 
Hooker
 
Toledo
 

January

 

Walker

 

Judiciary

 

government


Committee
 
question
 

legislation

 

argument

 

Immediately

 

unjust

 

convention

 

Tillotson

 

occupied

 

Washington


Chairman
 

delivery

 

thanked

 
enslavement
 

Repres

 
consequent
 
presenting
 

citizens

 

Jersey

 

comprehend


incapacity

 

ladies

 
replied
 
briefly
 

charging

 
result
 

corridors

 

disfranchisement

 

leading

 

proposing


partial

 

eleven

 
members
 

present

 
suppressing
 
polygamy
 

opposition

 

Spencer

 
enfranchisement
 

report