FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315  
1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   >>   >|  
Again in 1848, in supporting a motion of Mr. Joseph Hume in the House of Commons to the effect that the elective franchise should be extended to all householders, Mr. Cobden said: A gentleman asked me to support universal suffrage on the ground of principle, and I said to him, if it is a principle that a man should have a vote because he pays taxes, why should not a widow who pays taxes and is liable to serve as church-warden and overseer, have a vote for members of parliament? The gentleman replied that he agreed with me. In 1853, Mr. W. J. Fox, member for Oldham, in acknowledging the presentation to him by the ladies of Oldham of a signet-ring bearing the inscription, "Education, the birthright of all," spoke strongly in favor of women having a definite share in political life: If women have nothing to do with politics, honest men ought to have nothing to do with politics. They keep us pure, simple, just, earnest, in our exertions in politics and public life. They have to do with it, because while the portion of man may be by the rougher labors of the head and hands to work out many of the great results of life, the peculiar function of woman is to spread grace and softness, truth, beauty, benignity over all. Nor is woman confined to this. In fact I wish that her direct as well as indirect influence were still larger than it is in the sphere of politics. Why, we trust a woman with the sceptre of the realm, consider her adequate to make peers in the State and bishops in the Church; surely she must be adequate to send her representatives to the lower House. I know the time may not have come for mooting a question of this sort; but I know the time will come, and that woman will be something more than a mere adjective to man in political matters. She will become a substantive also. And why not? Other speakers and writers brought forward the same point. Jeremy Bentham declared he could find no reasons for the exclusion of women, though he laid no stress on the matter; Herbert Spencer in "Social Statics" (1851), Mr. Thomas Hare in his book on "Representation," and Mr. Mill in "Representative Government," all discussed it. In 1843 Mrs. Hugo Reid published an excellent volume, "A Plea for Woman," in which she maintained that "There is no good ground for the assumption that the possession and exercise of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315  
1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
politics
 

Oldham

 
political
 

gentleman

 

adequate

 

principle

 

ground

 
matters
 
adjective
 
larger

sphere
 

substantive

 

question

 

surely

 

Church

 

bishops

 

representatives

 

sceptre

 
mooting
 

stress


published
 

discussed

 

Government

 
Representation
 
Representative
 

excellent

 

assumption

 

possession

 

exercise

 
maintained

volume

 

Bentham

 

Jeremy

 

declared

 

speakers

 

writers

 
brought
 

forward

 

reasons

 

exclusion


Social

 

Statics

 
Thomas
 
Spencer
 

Herbert

 
matter
 

agreed

 

replied

 

warden

 

overseer