FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713  
714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   >>   >|  
ed. There has been an intelligent and honest difference among both trustees and professors on this interesting question, and the diversity has been complicated by the various grounds upon which the _pros_ and _cons_ are maintained. There are those who advocate the admission of girls to the University as a proper thing _per se_. Others consent to it, because the University cannot give the desired education separately. Others hold that girls should be admitted because of their equal rights to a university education, although their admission is very undesirable. Others oppose coeducation in the abstract, conceding that girls should be as well educated as boys, but insisting that they must be differently and therefore separately educated. These draw a clear line between "equal" and "similar" education, and hold that no university course of studies can be laid out that will not present much of classical literature and much of the mental, moral and natural sciences, that cannot be studied and recited by boys and girls together, without serious risk of lasting injury to both. Would it not be better, all things considered, to abjure this kind of classical literature, and instead of subjecting our sons to its baneful influence, give them the refining, elevating companionship of their sisters? If we would preserve the real modesty and purity of our daughters, it is quite as important that we should pay some attention to the delicacy and morality of the men with whom they are to associate. If a girl cannot read the classics with a young man without contamination, how can she live with him in all the intimacies of family life without a constant shock to her refined sensibilities? So long as society considers that any man of known wealth is a fit husband for our daughters, all this talk of the faculties and trustees of our colleges about protecting woman's modesty is the sheerest nonsense and hypocrisy. It is well to remember that these professors and students have mothers, wives and sisters, and if man is coarse and brutal, he invariably feels free to show his worst passions at his own fireside. To warn women against coeducation is to warn them against association with men in any relation whatsoever. FOOTNOTES: [255] See Appendix. [256] Carrie S. Burnham after long years of preparation and persistent effort for admission to the bar o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713  
714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

education

 

admission

 

Others

 

educated

 

coeducation

 

separately

 
university
 

modesty

 
classical
 

literature


professors

 
trustees
 
daughters
 
University
 

sisters

 
considers
 

husband

 
wealth
 

society

 

intimacies


classics
 

contamination

 

associate

 

delicacy

 

morality

 

constant

 

refined

 

family

 
faculties
 

sensibilities


brutal

 

whatsoever

 

relation

 

FOOTNOTES

 

association

 

fireside

 

Appendix

 

persistent

 
effort
 
preparation

Carrie
 

Burnham

 
passions
 
hypocrisy
 

remember

 
nonsense
 

sheerest

 

protecting

 

students

 
invariably