FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554  
555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   >>   >|  
ers at the town library, April 17 and May 1, 1874, at 1 o'clock P. M. DELIA A. CURTIS, JOHN NICHOLS, _S. S. Com. of Searsport._ Teachers will be expected to discountenance the use of tobacco and intoxicating liquors, and to use their best endeavors to impress on the minds of the children and youth committed to their care and instruction a proper understanding of the evil tendency of such habits; and no teacher need apply for a certificate to teach in this town, the ensuing year, who uses either. DELIA A. CURTIS. DEAR JOURNAL: Aroostook, though occupying the extreme northeastern portion of our good State of Maine, and still in the blush of youth, is not behind her sister counties in recognition of woman's fitness for office. The returns of town elections, so far as I have yet seen, give three towns in the county which have elected ladies[183] to serve as members of the school committee. L. J. Y. W. _Houlton, Maine._ In the autumn of 1874 the governor and council requested the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Court on the following questions: _First_--Under the constitution and laws of this State, can a woman, if duly appointed and qualified as a justice of the peace, legally perform all acts pertaining to that office? _Second_--Would it be competent for the legislature to authorize the appointment of a married woman to the office of justice of the peace; or to administer oaths, take acknowledgment of deeds or solemnize marriages, so that the same may be legal and valid? The following responses to these inquiries were received by the governor: the opinion of the court, drawn by Chief-justice Appleton, and concurred in by Justices Cutting, Peters, Danforth and Virgin; a dissenting opinion from Justices Walton and Barrows and one from Justice Dickerson. The opinion of the court is given below: To the questions proposed we have the honor to answer as follows: Whether it is expedient that women should hold the office of justice of the peace is not an inquiry proposed for our consideration. It is whether, under the existing constitution, they can be appointed to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554  
555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

opinion

 

justice

 

office

 

Justices

 

appointed

 

CURTIS

 
questions
 

governor

 
proposed
 

constitution


authorize

 
appointment
 
married
 
administer
 

competent

 
legislature
 

perform

 
Judicial
 

requested

 

Supreme


pertaining
 

Second

 

qualified

 

legally

 

answer

 

Barrows

 

Justice

 

Dickerson

 
Whether
 

inquiry


consideration

 

existing

 

expedient

 

Walton

 

dissenting

 

responses

 

acknowledgment

 

solemnize

 
marriages
 
inquiries

Cutting
 

Peters

 
Danforth
 
Virgin
 

concurred

 
Appleton
 

council

 

received

 

proper

 
understanding