for he says of it:
"Scantily Lord Marmion's ear could brook
The harper's barbarous lay."
T. D. RIDLEY.
_Punning Devices_ (Vol. viii., p. 270.).--In the 4th volume of Surtees'
_History of Durham_, p. 48., there is an account of the Orchard Chamber in
Sledwish Hall:
"In the centre is a shield of the arms of Clopton; being two coats
quarterly, a lion rampant and a cross _pattee fitchee_; over all, a
crescent for difference.[1] On two other shields, impressed from one
mould, are the initials E. C., the date 1584, and a _tun_ with a rose
_clapt on_."[2]
OLD GRUMBLEUM.
[Footnote 1: This note says the arms are reversed, being impressed from a
mould.]
[Footnote 2: "The crest of Clopton is a falcon _clapping_ his wings, and
rising from a tun; and I verily believe the rose _clapt on_ to be the
miserable quibble intended."]
_Ashman's Park_--_Wingfield's Portrait_ (Vol. viii., p. 299.).-Could any
correspondent in Suffolk inform me if Ashman's Park has been sold; and if
the pictures are anywhere to be found, especially that of Sir Anthony
Wingfield? The communication of H. C. K. relative to the above subject is
very interesting.
Q.
"_Crowns have their compass_," _&c._ (Vol. iv., p. 428.).--In the
well-known lines attributed to Shakspeare, and quoted in the above volume,
the third stands thus:
"Of more than earth can earth make none partaker."
I find that Quarles has borrowed this in his _Emblems_, book i. Emblem vi.:
"Of more than earth can earth make none possest."
HENRY H. BREEN.
St. Lucia.
{377}
_Ampers_ & (Vol. ii., pp.230. 284.; Vol. viii., pp. 173. 223. 284.).--Allow
me to thank both [Phi]. and MR. HENRY WALTER for their replies to my Query;
but I am unhappily no wiser than MR. LOWER was after [Phi].'s first
response. What on earth "et-per-se" or "and-per-se-and" can mean, I am at a
loss to imagine. Why should _et_ be called "_et_ by itself?" Until this
Query is answered, I am as much in the dark as ever. While I am upon the
matter, I would farther ask this mysterious _Ampers and_, "who gave thee
that name?" May it find a proxy to answer for it!
C. MANSFIELD INGLEBY.
Birmingham.
The origin of this expression is, explained in Vol. ii., p. 318. With
regard to the orthography of the word, it seems to me that, if the etymon
be followed, it ought to be written _and-per-se-and_; if the pronunciation,
_ampussy and_.
L.
_Throwing Old Shoes for Luck_ (Vol
|