FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  
tain are seriously made the strain involved is harmful to the health and temper--if the efforts do not succeed the minds of husband and wife are troubled by doubts and anxieties which are damaging to their intimate relationships. And, moreover, if this harmful restraint succeeds in preventing conception there eventuates the inevitable prevalence of sex excitement followed by abortive and half-realised satisfaction, and the enhanced risk of the man or woman yielding to outside sex temptations. No--birth control by abstention is either ineffective, or, if effective, is pernicious. THE HOME'S TRUE INTERESTS. I will next consider Artificial Control. The forces in modern life which make for birth control are so strong that only convincing reasons will make people desist from it. It is said to be unnatural and intrinsically immoral. This word unnatural perplexes me. Civilisation involves the chaining of natural forces and their conversion to man's will and uses. Much of medicine and surgery consists of means to overcome nature. When anaesthetics were first used at childbirth there was an outcry on the part of many worthy and religious people that their use under such circumstances was unnatural and wicked, because God meant woman to suffer the struggles and pains of childbirth. Now we all admit it is right to control the process of childbirth, and to save the mother as much pain as possible. It is no more unnatural to control conception by artificial means than to control childbirth by artificial means. Surely the whole question turns on whether these artificial means are for the good or harm of the individual and the community! Do all contraceptive measures damage the individual? The answer to that depends on the purpose for which they are used. If they are used to render unions childless or inadequately fruitful they are harmful. There are grounds for thinking that unrealisation of maternity favours sterility. Generally speaking, birth control before the first child is inadvisable. On the other hand, the justifiable use of birth control is to limit the number of children, and to spread out their arrival in such a way as to serve their true interests and those of their home. That such applications of birth control produce no harm receives support from the study of the numbers and distribution of the children of the professional classes. The advantage and disadvantage of this or that cont
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >>  



Top keywords:

control

 

childbirth

 
unnatural
 

artificial

 
harmful
 

conception

 

individual

 

people

 

forces

 

children


question

 

community

 

suffer

 

struggles

 

circumstances

 

wicked

 

mother

 

process

 

Surely

 

inadequately


interests

 

number

 

spread

 

arrival

 
applications
 
classes
 

professional

 

advantage

 

disadvantage

 

distribution


numbers

 

produce

 

receives

 

support

 
justifiable
 
childless
 

unions

 

religious

 

fruitful

 
render

damage
 

measures

 
answer
 
depends
 
purpose
 
grounds
 

thinking

 

inadvisable

 

speaking

 
Generally