gion the
early promise of which was not fulfilled, the splendid moral
aspirations of which were stifled amid the superstitions they were
too weak to conquer.
BOOKS RECOMMENDED
For general information Wilkinson's _Egyptians_.
E. A. W. Budge, _History of Egypt_, vols. i.-viii., 1902-03.
E. A. W. Budge, _The Mummy_; chapters on Egyptian funeral archaeology,
Cambridge, 1893.
E. A. W. Budge, _The Book of the Dead_, English Translation of the
Theban Recension, 3 vols., 1910.
Flinders Petrie, _A History of Egypt_.
Flinders Petrie, in _Oxford Proceedings_, vol. i. p. 184, _sqq._
The Histories of Antiquity of Duncker, Maspero, and especially Ed.
Meyer.
Erman, _Life in Ancient Egypt_, 1894.
Maspero, _Manual of Egyptian Archaeology_, Second Edition, 1895.
Renouf's _Hibbert Lectures_.
Tiele, _History of the Egyptian Religion_, translated by Ballingal.
Wiedemann, _Aegyptische Geschichte_, 1884-88; "Die Religion der alten
Aegyptier," 1890; also "Egyptian Religion," in Hastings' _Bible
Dictionary_, vol. v.
A. O. Lange, "Die Aegypter" in De la Saussaye. _Records of the Past_,
First Series (1873-81), vols. ii., iv., vi., viii., x., xii. Second
Series, 1888-92, vols. ii.-vi.
Benson and Gourlay, _The Temple of Mut in Asher_, 1899.
Naville, _The Old Egyptian Faith_, translated by Colin Campbell,
1909.
Colin Campbell, _Two Theban Queens_, 1909. A study of the
inscriptions in two royal tombs.
PART III
THE SEMITIC GROUP
CHAPTER X
THE SEMITIC RELIGION
As used by the modern scholar, the term Semites or Semitic races
includes the Arabs, the Hebrews, the Canaanites and Phenicians, the
Syrians or Arameans, the Babylonians and the Assyrians. This
enumeration differs from that of the tenth chapter of Genesis, where
the children of Shem include Elam, or the dwellers in Susiana, and
Lud or the Lydians, while the tribes who dwelt in Canaan before the
Hebrews are placed in another and a lower division of the human
family. The principle of the enumeration in Genesis is probably that
of geographical neighbourhood; the modern principle is that of
linguistic affinity. The peoples mentioned above spoke, or still
speak, languages which belong to the same family of human speech. The
inference from affinity of language to affinity of blood is in this
case a strong one, so that the peoples using the Semitic tongues are
considered to be of the same race. To the question, where the cradle
of the Se
|