FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   >>  
Welfare Officer be required to report progress to a Magistrate for his personal information and to enable him to check on the correctness of his judgment, there can be no possible objection. When asked for, indeed, this is already done. If, on the other hand, it is proposed that the Magistrate have continuing authority over the child, then it would turn the Court into a social work agency and would run counter to the whole trend in the development of Children's Court and child welfare work from the beginning of this century. The Magistrate would be compelled to take on responsibilities for which he is not trained, and Child Welfare Officers would tend to become merely junior probation officers attached to the Court. One of the advantages of the present system is that the Superintendent, being the final authority, can ensure uniform standards of case work throughout New Zealand. If it were left to each individual Magistrate to decide exactly what should be done with children, it is certain that wide variations in principles and procedures would occur. Experience has shown, for example, that some Magistrates, with no first-hand knowledge of our institutions, would send to them children for whom they are not established to cater. "With regard to the Committee's suggestion that there 'should be some person or body apart from the departmental officers to whom a child could turn for help ...', we would agree that something like the Visiting Justice system of the Justice Department might apply to our institutions as a guarantee to the public and as a protection to both children and officers. However, to extend such a system to children boarded out in private homes would be to ask for endless trouble. People would be loath to accept State wards into their homes if it laid them open to official visits from laymen whose sole function was to hear complaints from the children. The visits of Child Welfare Officers and of Inspectors of the Division must, we feel, be accepted as the main guarantee to the public of fair treatment." Without expressing any decided opinion, the Committee felt that what the Director of Education has to say is worthy of consideration by Government. Certain Specific Changes Proposed by the Mazengarb Committee In clause (5) on pages 60 to 63, both inclusive, of the re
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   >>  



Top keywords:
children
 

Magistrate

 

Committee

 

Welfare

 

system

 

officers

 
authority
 

Justice

 

public

 

guarantee


Officers

 

visits

 

institutions

 

People

 
accept
 

trouble

 

extend

 

endless

 

private

 

boarded


Visiting
 

departmental

 

suggestion

 
person
 
protection
 

Department

 

However

 

Inspectors

 

worthy

 

consideration


Government

 

Certain

 

Education

 

decided

 

opinion

 

Director

 

Specific

 
Changes
 

inclusive

 

Proposed


Mazengarb

 

clause

 
expressing
 
laymen
 

function

 

official

 
treatment
 

Without

 
accepted
 

complaints