FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241  
242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   >>   >|  
s to him in the country's affairs," that it might be well to adhere closely to the late Queen's Civil List, and that the example of "a moderate and sober Court" would be of the highest value to the nation. On March 11th Sir M. E. Hicks-Beach moved the appointment of a House of Commons' Committee to deal with the question, composed of Mr. Balfour, Sir W. Hart Dyke, Sir F. Dixon-Hartland, Sir S. Hoare, Mr. W. L. Jackson, with seven other members and himself, as representatives of the Government party and Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, Sir William Harcourt, Sir Henry Fowler, Sir James Kitson, Mr. H. Labouchere, and three others, as representing the Opposition. The _Times_ of the following day said that there were two reasons for somewhat increasing the sum to be voted--the fact of the King having a Consort of whom the nation was proud, while Queen Victoria was unmarried at the time of the former vote, and the fact, as the Chancellor of the Exchequer put it to the House, that the King was now the head of a world-wide Empire. As finally decided in the Report of the Select Committee the new Civil List was placed at L470,000 for the Sovereign--of which L110,000 was to go to the Privy Purse in place of L60,000 received by Queen Victoria; the Duke of Cornwall and York was to receive L20,000 annually, and the Duchess L10,000--in addition, of course, to the L60,000 coming to the Heir Apparent from the Duchy of Lancaster; the King's children, the Duchess of Fife, Princess Victoria and Princess Charles of Denmark, were each to have L6,000 a year for life; while the contingent annuity of L30,000 provided in the event of Queen Alexandra surviving her husband, was to be increased to L70,000 and a similar contingent grant of L30,000 arranged for the Duchess of Cornwall and York. The only apparent opposition in the Committee to these proposals was from Mr. Labouchere, who suggested certain variations and reductions. There was little influential criticism of the changes proposed--the _Daily News_, from which opposition might, perhaps have come, speaking of one special increase of L50,000, as follows: "The Queen must have a separate Household if the Monarchy is to be maintained, as most people wish that it should be maintained, in its ancient splendour; and the gracious kindness of Queen Alexandra, who has endeared herself to all the subjects of her husband, will make the tax-payer in her case a cheerful giver." On May 9th Resolutions b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241  
242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Committee

 

Victoria

 

Duchess

 

contingent

 
Alexandra
 

Princess

 

maintained

 

nation

 
husband
 

Labouchere


opposition
 
Cornwall
 

apparent

 

surviving

 

increased

 

similar

 

arranged

 

Charles

 

coming

 

Apparent


addition
 

receive

 

annually

 

Lancaster

 

annuity

 

children

 
Denmark
 
provided
 

proposed

 
kindness

gracious

 

endeared

 
splendour
 

ancient

 

people

 
subjects
 
Resolutions
 

cheerful

 

Monarchy

 

criticism


influential

 

suggested

 

proposals

 
variations
 

reductions

 
separate
 

Household

 

increase

 

speaking

 
special