FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>  
and those who know Professor SHEPHERD'S resources and affluence will recognize the desperate nature of the task. As for the Valley, I have before me a protest against the erection of a monument to Sheridan, in which the writer gives an itemized account of the havoc inflicted on the property of non-combatants in the County of Rockingham alone. The protest reminds me of my youthful surprise when I first saw the statue of Tilly in the Feldherrnhalle at Munich. Somehow I had not thought well of Tilly before. But all estimates of military exigencies must be revised by the light of the new standards of the time in which we live. However, as this note goes to the printer, I am made aware of an article by Maj. JOHN BIGELOW, U. S. A., published in the N. Y. Times of June 13, 1915, in which the author musters the evidence of the behaviour of Sherman's men. 1864 seems not to have been so very far behind 1914 after all.] [Note: "The hate of Celt to Saxon, and the contempt of Saxon for Celt, simply paled and grew expressionless when compared with the contempt and hate felt by the Southron towards the Yankee anterior to our Civil War and while it was in progress. No Houyhnhnms ever looked on Yahoo with greater aversion; better, far better death than further contamination through political association."--C. F. ADAMS, Trans-Atlantic Historical Solidarity, p. 176. One recalls Halleck's Connecticut: Virginians look Upon them with as favorable eyes As Gabriel on the devil in paradise.] The war began, the war went on. War is a rough game. It is an omelet that cannot be made without breaking eggs, not only eggs in _esse_, but also eggs in _posse_. So far as I have read about war, ours was no worse than some other wars. While it lasted, the conduct of the combatants on either side was represented in the blackest colors by the other. Even the ordinary and legitimate doing to death was considered criminal if the deed was done by a ruthless rebel or a ruffianly invader. Non-combatants were especially eloquent. In describing the end of a brother who had been killed while trying to get a shot at a Yankee, a Southern girl raved about the "murdered patriot" and the "dastardly wretch" who had anticipated him. But I do not criticize, for I remember an English account of the battle of New Orleans, in which General Pakenham was represented as having been picked off by a "sneaking Yankee rifle." Those who were enga
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>  



Top keywords:

combatants

 

Yankee

 

contempt

 
represented
 

account

 
protest
 

breaking

 

omelet

 
recalls
 
Halleck

Solidarity

 

Historical

 
Atlantic
 
Connecticut
 
Virginians
 

paradise

 

Gabriel

 

favorable

 

considered

 
dastardly

patriot

 
wretch
 

anticipated

 

murdered

 

killed

 

Southern

 
criticize
 
remember
 

picked

 

sneaking


Pakenham

 

battle

 

English

 

Orleans

 

General

 

brother

 

colors

 
blackest
 

ordinary

 

legitimate


lasted
 

conduct

 
criminal
 
invader
 
eloquent
 

describing

 

ruffianly

 
ruthless
 
Somehow
 

Munich