FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>  
towards the explanation of Scripture by "perception" rather than by revelation. "The Lord appeared unto me"; "The Lord spake unto me"; say the Prophets, and they appeal occasionally to supernatural attestation of their assertions. But the modern expository savant, wiser to be sure than the Prophet, assures us that they arrived at their messages by observation, by meditation, by development of thought and character, and practically by nothing different from these things. Accordingly, their "inspiration" was strictly speaking the same in kind as that of a Chrysostom, or a Luther, or a Shakespeare. Do not you say so, or imply that it is so. Do not go for mere company's sake with the current of naturalistic thought. Sure I am that you are most unlikely, if you do, to be the instrument of _super_natural _effects_ in your preaching. "WHAT IS JUSTIFICATION?" (_c_) "What is Justification? It is, _the making man just_." Is it indeed? I should read that sentence with alarm, if I did not know the writer! Its sentiment is practically Roman Catholic. Moreover, it puts a meaning on the word in question, contradicted by the common usages of language; an important consideration when we study a Scriptural theological term. When I "justify my opinion" I do not _make it right_, but vindicate it as already right. When the Hebrew judge "justified the righteous," [Deut. xxv. 1] he did not improve him, but pronounced him satisfactory to the law. And when God, for Christ's sake, justifies you who believe in Jesus, He does not in that act make you good; He pronounces you, for His Son's sake, to be satisfactory to His Law, for purposes of your personal acceptance. "WHY DOES FAITH JUSTIFY?" (_d_) "Why has faith such power to justify? Because, _carried out to its fullest extent, it implies assimilation_ to its Object." Here again I should be alarmed, if I did not know the writer's general convictions, which are sound enough. But this particular sentence again is in full harmony with Romanist doctrine. And, as a fact, with the Bible open, and with usages of common language before us, it can easily be exposed as a confusion of words and thought. Faith, carried out ever so fully, is just faith still; personal reliance, personal confidence on God in His Word. That reliance is His appointed (and divinely natural) way for our reception of Jesus Christ. For our Justification, it receives Christ in His merits; it does _that_, and that only, and al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>  



Top keywords:
personal
 

thought

 

Christ

 
carried
 
natural
 
justify
 

usages

 

common

 

writer

 

Justification


sentence
 
satisfactory
 

language

 

practically

 

reliance

 

confusion

 

divinely

 

justifies

 

exposed

 

pronounces


easily
 

appointed

 

justified

 
righteous
 

improve

 
merits
 
confidence
 

pronounced

 

convictions

 

receives


Because

 

fullest

 
reception
 
assimilation
 

Object

 
alarmed
 

implies

 

extent

 

general

 

Hebrew


acceptance

 

purposes

 
JUSTIFY
 

harmony

 
Romanist
 
doctrine
 

things

 

character

 
messages
 

observation