FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  
f six-and-eightpence was held sufficient penalty for a mortal sin. [390] _Ancestors_.--See the _Phoenix_, a collection of valuable papers, published in London, 1707; and the _Harleian Miscellany_, &c. [391] _Rome_.--This was the invariable practice of the Irish Church. It will be remembered how letters and expostulations had been sent to the Holy See in regard to the temporal oppressions of the English settlers. [392] _Davies.--Cause why Ireland was never Subdued_.--Thorn's Reprints, vol. i. p. 694. [393] _More_.-Sir Thomas More's son-in-law, Roper, gives the following account of his condemnation: "Mr. Rich, pretending friendly talk with him, among other things of a set course, said this unto him: 'Admit there were, sir, an Act of Parliament that the realm should take me for king; would not you, Master More, take me for King?' 'Yes, sir,' quoth Sir Thomas More, 'that I would.' 'I put the case further,' quoth Mr. Rich, 'that there were an Act of Parliament that all the realm should take me for Pope; would not you then, Master More, take me for Pope?' 'For answer, sir,' quoth Sir Thomas More, 'to your first case, the Parliament may well, Master Rich, meddle with the state of temporal princes; but to make answer to your other case, I will put you this case. Suppose the Parliament should make a law that God should not be God, would you then, Master Rich, say that God were not God?' 'No, sir,' quoth he, 'that I would not, sith no Parliament may make any such law.' 'No more,' quoth Sir Thomas More, 'could the Parliament make the King supreme head of the Church.' Upon whose only report was Sir Thomas indicted for high treason on the statute to deny the King to be supreme head of the Church, into which indictment were put these heinous words--maliciously, traitorously, and diabolically." [394] _Parliament_.--State Papers, vol. ii. p. 437. [395] _Vote_.--Irish Statutes, 28th Henry VIII. c. xii. [396] _Succession_.--Froude, vol. i. p. 94. He also quotes Hall to the effect that "all indifferent and discreet persons judged that it was right and necessary." Persons who were "indifferent" enough to think that any reason could make a sin necessary, or "discreet" enough to mind losing their heads or their property, were generally of that opinion. But Henry's difficulties in divorcing his wife are a matter of history. [397] _Saw it_,--Four Masters, vol. v. p. 1445. [398] _Trinidad_.--Madrid, 1714. [399] _Truly_.--St
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Parliament

 

Thomas

 
Master
 

Church

 

discreet

 

indifferent

 
supreme
 
temporal
 

answer

 

report


indicted
 
Statutes
 
maliciously
 

traitorously

 

indictment

 

heinous

 
diabolically
 

Papers

 

statute

 

treason


quotes

 

matter

 

history

 

difficulties

 

divorcing

 

Masters

 

Madrid

 

Trinidad

 

opinion

 

generally


effect

 

persons

 

Succession

 

Froude

 

judged

 
losing
 
property
 

reason

 

Persons

 

Miscellany


invariable
 
Reprints
 

Harleian

 

pretending

 

friendly

 

condemnation

 
account
 

Subdued

 
practice
 

expostulations