FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  
rest in her real estate attached to trust estates, but she could claim no interest in trust estates of her husband. If the wife owned leases of land they could be sold or assigned by the husband during marriage. If he survived his wife they belonged to him, if she survived him, they belonged to her, provided he had not disposed of them while living. [Sidenote: Descent of property.] Personal property descended to males and females in equal shares, but the oldest son was entitled to the whole of his father's real property. [Sidenote: Unity of person in criminal law.] The unity of husband and wife was not so strongly affirmed by the common law when it dealt with their relation to criminal matters. When a wife committed an offense against the state she possessed a separate and distinct life and personalty, for the purposes of punishment. It is true that she was still inferior and this distinction was recognized and emphasized by the difference in the penalties imposed for the commission of the same crimes, these penalties being in inverse ratio to the importance of the criminal. [Sidenote: Theft, burglary, etc.] [Sidenote: Presumption of innocence.] If a wife committed theft, burglary or other offenses in the company or presence of her husband, the law presumed that she acted under compulsion and held her not guilty, but this presumption did not extend to cases of murder or treason, and it might always be overcome by proof that she acted independently. The exception in cases of murder or treason, we are informed, was not alone because of the magnitude of the crimes, but rather on account of "the husband having broken through the most sacred tie of social community by rebellion against the state, had no right to that obedience from a wife which he himself, as a subject, had forgotten to pay." [Sidenote: Murder of wife.] [Sidenote: Murder of husband.] If a man murdered his wife it was as if he had murdered a stranger, and he might avail himself of the benefit of clergy, and secure immunity from punishment, provided he could read, but women were denied all benefit of clergy because of their sex, and because they "were not called upon to read." If a wife killed her husband it was a much more serious offense, he being her lord, and she was guilty of treason and subject to the same punishment as if she had killed the king. [Sidenote: Petit treason.] In cases of petit treason the penalty depended upon th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

husband

 

Sidenote

 

treason

 

property

 

criminal

 
punishment
 

murder

 

subject

 

guilty

 

burglary


murdered
 

offense

 

benefit

 

committed

 

crimes

 

penalties

 

Murder

 
killed
 

estates

 

survived


belonged

 

provided

 

clergy

 

exception

 

informed

 

independently

 
presumption
 
compulsion
 

extend

 
depended

overcome

 

magnitude

 

penalty

 
account
 

denied

 

obedience

 

immunity

 

forgotten

 
secure
 

stranger


presumed

 

called

 

broken

 

community

 

rebellion

 

social

 
sacred
 
oldest
 

entitled

 

shares