FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>  
forgiveness, neither in this world, nor in that which is to come, and of that day when He who wept over Jerusalem and prayed for His murderers and died for the world will say unto them on His left hand, "Depart from Me, ye cursed, into the eternal fire which is prepared for the devil and his angels." These are _His_ words, and it is because they are His they make us tremble. He _is_ "gentle Jesus, meek and mild"; that is why His sternness is so terrible. These things are not said in order to defend any particular theory of future punishment--on that dread subject, indeed, the present writer has no "theory" to defend; he frankly confesses himself an agnostic--but rather to claim for the solemn fact of retribution a place in our minds akin to that which it held in the teaching of our Lord. We need have no further concern than to be loyal to Him. Does, then, such loyalty admit of a belief in universal salvation? Is it open to us to assert that in Christ the whole race is predestined to "glory, honour, and immortality"? The "larger hope" of the universalist-- "that good shall fall At last--far off--at last, to all, And every winter change to spring"-- is, indeed, one to which no Christian heart can be a stranger; yearnings such as these spring up within us unbidden and uncondemned. But when it is definitely and positively asserted that "God has destined all men to eternal glory, irrespective of their faith and conduct," "that no antagonism to the Divine authority, no insensibility to the Divine love, can prevent the eternal decree from being accomplished," we shall do well to pause, and pause again. The old doctrine of an assured salvation for an elect few we reject without hesitation. But, as Dr. Dale has pointed out,[63] the difference between the old doctrine and the new is merely an arithmetical, not a moral difference: where the old put "some," the new puts "all"; and the moral objections which are valid against the one are not less valid against the other also. I dare not say to myself, and therefore I dare not say to others, that, let a man live as he may, it yet shall be well with him in the end. The facts of experience are against it; the words of Christ are against it. "The very conception of human freedom involves the possibility of its permanent misuse, of what our Lord Himself calls 'eternal sin.'" If a man can go on successfully resisting Divine grace in this life, what reason have w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>  



Top keywords:

eternal

 
Divine
 

defend

 

salvation

 

difference

 

doctrine

 
theory
 
spring
 

Christ

 

unbidden


yearnings

 

assured

 

stranger

 

uncondemned

 

positively

 
irrespective
 

insensibility

 
authority
 

antagonism

 

prevent


accomplished

 

conduct

 

decree

 
asserted
 

destined

 

freedom

 

involves

 

possibility

 
conception
 

experience


permanent

 

misuse

 
resisting
 

reason

 

successfully

 

Himself

 
arithmetical
 
pointed
 

hesitation

 

objections


reject
 

sternness

 

gentle

 

tremble

 

angels

 

terrible

 

punishment

 
subject
 

present

 
future