FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   >>  
ct on literature. Sir Richard Blackmore contributed his share to the growing wave of bourgeois morality, which in the 18th century was reflected in the middle-class appeal of Addison and Steel, Lillo's _London Merchant_, and Richardson's almost feminine plea for virtue rewarded. A physician, Blackmore had turned to poetry for relaxation and composed his soporific epics, by his own admission, in the coffee-houses and in his coach while visiting patients. In the preface, to _Prince Arthur_ (1695) the City Bard took occasion to flay the Wits of the day for their immorality, an attack which he followed up in 1697 with the Preface to _King Arthur_, whose thinly disguised political allegory won him a knighthood. Up to this point the Wits had treated him with amused scorn, but when he called his big guns into action in the _Satyr against Wit_ (dated 1700 but issued late in 1699) the Wits set out to crush him for once and all. _Commendatory Verses on the Author of the Two Arthurs and the Satyr against Wit_ (1700), the reply, was far from commendatory. Edited by Tom Brown and sponsored by Christopher Codrington, this miscellany attempted in scurrilous and often bad verse to laugh the Knight out of literary existence. Its main distinction lies in the list of contributors, among whom were Sir Charles Sedley, Richard Steele, Tom Brown, and probably John Dennis. Blackmore's supporters answered _Commendatory Verses_ with _Discommendatory_ _Verses on Those Which are Truly Commendatory, on the Author of the Two Arthurs, and the Satyr against Wit_. (1700). It is not at all certain that Blackmore emerged second best in this exchange of blows in the miscellanies. At any rate, unabashed he went on to write more epics on Elizabeth, Alfred, Job, and to win himself a doubtful immortality by being pilloried in Pope's _Dunciad_. Throughout his writings Blackmore has a good deal to say about Wit, and much about the abuse of it. While Swift in the _Tale of a Tub_ scolds the Wits for their addiction to nonsense and irreligion, Blackmore goes still further in the _Satyr_, seeing Wit as something which, in common practice, is evil and vicious, to be eradicated as quickly as possible. It is the enemy of virtue and religion (in the Preface to _Creation_, 1712, he links it with atheism), a form of insanity, in opposition to 'Right Reason', and the seducer of young men. Combatting its iniquities, Blackmore proposes to set up a Bank and Mint of Wit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   >>  



Top keywords:
Blackmore
 
Verses
 
Commendatory
 

Author

 

Preface

 
Arthur
 
Richard
 

Arthurs

 

virtue

 

unabashed


Charles

 
Sedley
 

Steele

 

Alfred

 
contributors
 

Elizabeth

 

miscellanies

 

emerged

 

Dennis

 

exchange


supporters

 

answered

 

Discommendatory

 

religion

 

Creation

 
atheism
 
quickly
 

practice

 
vicious
 

eradicated


insanity

 

iniquities

 

proposes

 

Combatting

 

opposition

 
Reason
 

seducer

 

common

 

writings

 

Throughout


Dunciad

 

doubtful

 
immortality
 

pilloried

 

irreligion

 
nonsense
 
addiction
 

scolds

 

admission

 
coffee