ueathing 'money;'
and a weighty, valuable essay it is, with no lack of golden grains and
eke of diamond-dust in its composition. The thoughts are not given in
the bullion lump, but are well refined, and having passed through the
engraver's hands, they shine with the true polish, ring with the true
sound. In terse, pregnant, and somewhat oracular diction, we are here
instructed how to avoid the evils contingent upon bold commercial
enterprise--how to guard against excesses of the accumulative
instinct--how to exercise a thoroughly conscientious mode of
regulating expenditure, eschewing prodigality, that vice of a weak
nature, as avarice is of a strong one--how to be generous in giving;
'for the essence of generosity is in self-sacrifice, waste, on the
contrary, comes always by self-indulgence'--how to withstand
solicitations for loans, when the loans are to accommodate weak men in
sacrificing the future to the present. The essay on _Humility and
Independence_ is equally good, and pleasantly demonstrates the
proposition, that Humility is the true mother of Independence; and
that Pride, which is so often supposed to stand to her in that
relation, is in reality the step-mother by whom is wrought the very
destruction and ruin of Independence. False humilities are ordered
into court, and summarily convicted by this single-eyed judge, whose
cross-examination of these 'sham respectabilities' elicits many a
suggestive practical truth. There is more of philosophy and prudence
than of romance in the excursus on _Choice in Marriage_; but the
philosophy is shrewd and instructive, uttering many a homely hint of
value in its way: as where we are reminded that if marrying _for_
money is to be justified only in the case of those unhappy persons who
are fit for nothing better, it does not follow that marrying _without_
money is to be justified in others; and again, that the negotiations
and transactions connected with marriage-settlements are eminently
useful, as searching character and testing affection, before an
irrevocable step be taken; and again, that when two very young persons
are joined together in matrimony, it is as if one sweet-pea should be
put as a prop to another. The essay on _Wisdom_ is elevated and
thoughtful, like most of the essayist's papers, but somewhat too heavy
for miscellaneous readers. With his wonted clearness he distinguishes
Wisdom from understanding, talents, capacity, ability, sagacity,
sense, &c. and defi
|