FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290  
291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   >>   >|  
ischarged Sommersett," is absurd and baseless.[397] For on the 27th of April, 1785 (thirteen years after the famous decision), Lord Mansfield himself said, in reference to the Sommersett case, "that his decision went no farther than that the master cannot by force compel the slave to go out of the kingdom." Thirty-five years of suffering and degradation remained for the Africans after the decision of Lord Mansfield. His lordship's decision was rendered on the 22d of June, 1772; and in 1807, thirty-five years afterwards, the British government abolished the slave-trade. And then, after twenty-seven years more of reflection, slavery was abolished in English possessions. _So, sixty-two years after Lord Mansfield's decision, England emancipated her slaves!_ It took only two generations for the people to get rid of slavery under the British flag. How true, then, that "facts are stranger than fiction"! In 1770 John Swain of Nantucket brought suit against Elisha Folger, captain of the vessel "Friendship," for allowing a Mr. Roth to receive on board his ship a Negro boy named "Boston," and for the recovery of the slave. This was a jury-trial in the Court of Common Pleas. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of the slave, and he was "manumitted by the magistrates." John Swain took an appeal from the decision of the Nantucket Court to the Supreme Court of Boston, but never prosecuted it.[398] In 1770, in Hanover, Plymouth County, a Negro asked his master to grant him his freedom as _his right_. The master refused; and the Negro, with assistance of counsel, succeeded in obtaining his liberty.[399] "In October of 1773, an action was brought against Richard Greenleaf, of Newburyport, by Caesar [Hendrick,] a colored man, whom he claimed as his slave, for holding him in bondage. He laid the damages at fifty pounds. The counsel for the plaintiff, in whose favor the jury brought in their verdict and awarded him eighteen pounds damages and costs, was John Lowell, esquire, afterward judge Lowell. This case excited much interest, as it was the first, if not the only one of the kind, that ever occurred in the county."[400] This case is mentioned in full by Mr. Dane in his "Abridgment and Digest of American Law," vol. ii. p. 426. In the Inferior Court of Common Pleas, in the county of Essex, July term in 1774, a Negro slave of one Caleb Dodge of Beverly brought an action against his mas
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290  
291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

decision

 
brought
 
master
 

Mansfield

 
counsel
 
action
 

Lowell

 

Nantucket

 

pounds

 

abolished


slavery

 

British

 
damages
 

county

 
verdict
 

Sommersett

 

Boston

 
Common
 

October

 

prosecuted


freedom

 

Greenleaf

 

Caesar

 

Newburyport

 

Richard

 
liberty
 

Plymouth

 

Hanover

 
obtaining
 

succeeded


Hendrick

 

refused

 

assistance

 

County

 
Digest
 

Abridgment

 

American

 

occurred

 

mentioned

 
Beverly

Inferior
 
plaintiff
 

bondage

 

claimed

 

holding

 

awarded

 

interest

 

excited

 
eighteen
 

esquire